23-year-old woman who is trapped in the body of an EIGHT-YEAR-OLD girl introduces her parents to a new love interest

You can put as many captions as you like on her. If she looks underage, she's jailbait. Even some anime falls under this law in SA as it's a depiction.
Ah yes the meme about the 500 year old dragon lord wizard who conveniently looks like a 7 year old.
 
If she looks underage, despite not being a minor, the pics are illegal in SA.

So if the judge is from Boksburg many teenager looks like 30 year olds from anywhere will be able to charge an actual 30 year old woman for distributing child porn because in his mind this 30 year woman looks to be the same age as teenage Boksburger?
 
So if the judge is from Boksburg many teenager looks like 30 year olds from anywhere will be able to charge an actual 30 year old woman for distributing child porn because in his mind this 30 year woman looks to be the same age as teenage Boksburger?

The law is clear.
 
It isn't? What is an act to you then?
Come on. That act governs film and publications. That has nothing to do with what people keep on their phones. We weren't talking about making movies. You explicity said:

Are you aware that the law says possessing an image of a minor or a person that appears to be a minor are the same?
So yet again please show me the law that says I can't keep pictures of my 20y/o girlfriend who looks 16.
 
Come on. That act governs film and publications. That has nothing to do with what people keep on their phones. We weren't talking about making movies. You explicity said:


So yet again please show me the law that says I can't keep pictures of my 20y/o girlfriend who looks 16.

There is no such law. Such a law would would basically render legal age useless and we go on perception/looks in which case you shagging your gf would basically be statutory rape "because she looks like a minor"...
 
There is no such law. Such a law would would basically render legal age useless and we go on perception/looks in which case you shagging your gf would basically be statutory rape "because she looks like a minor"...
Or pictures of your own kids, nephews etc. The Film & Publications board has fkall to do with that. Not sure how this is even an argument.

@Cosmik Debris According to you parents can't keep pictures of their kids on their phones?
 

My attempt to make things less weird in this thread.

Shauna Gets Carded at a Sex Shop | I Am Shauna Rae

 
No, if she's 19 and nude by default she is been depicted as a person she is at the age she's at.
Why do you say that?

Actors play characters younger than themselves all the time.

If you had a flat chested 18 year old playing the part of the 4 year old, where there is a nude/sex scene then its a problem. That's what this rule is about.
 
Strange that nobody busted FHM and Maxim and the other men's interest magazines from back in the day for child porn if the law is so clear according to your interpretation.

Check the dates of the acts.
 
There is no such law. Such a law would would basically render legal age useless and we go on perception/looks in which case you shagging your gf would basically be statutory rape "because she looks like a minor"...

Again. Straw man argument. My argument is about images.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X