Mista_Mobsta
Expert Member
I am still miffed by the general lackluster rebate option offered but at least I understand why they did it the way they did.The general consensus will always be that any tax incentive is too little. The question is given the allocated budget, what will yield the highest result (increased generation/decreased grid usage).
I'm pretty sure the guys at treasury ran multiple models and determined this would give them most bang for buck.
I get why some guys here would disagree, but their absolute insistence that everyone else is obviously wrong is misguided.
I guess our expectations as tax payers were, once again, set too high as we expected a rather big incentive to invest in solar, due to the state of disaster. Hence all the emotional comments in the thread...