TheChamp
Honorary Master
I will wait for the book and for him to be safely tucked away overseas.Won't you wait for the book ? "How I was crucified like Jesus just because of my skin color" penned by modern day William Wallace
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I will wait for the book and for him to be safely tucked away overseas.Won't you wait for the book ? "How I was crucified like Jesus just because of my skin color" penned by modern day William Wallace
Answer is No.
Won't you wait for the book ? "How I was crucified like Jesus just because of my skin color" penned by modern day William Wallace
Yes, I don't have time for De Ruyter's games, but do play along.I think he will wait longer than than just for this book before he admits his heroes can be wrong, like until Jesus comes.
I don't think he is safe. GLM is going to take him out just as they did all apartheid people. No one goes against GLM, no matter what.I will wait for the book and for him to be safely tucked away overseas.
Looks like Daily Maverick are saying it doesn't matter to submit evidence because nothing will happen anyway, but to me it's simple, the person who makes claims and submits evidence or at the very least owns up to the accusations is the one who has the credibility and moral high ground.
Many people did just that even though the cases never went anywhere, people like Themba Maseko, he never went to the press and said some high ranking politician told me to do this and that for some well connected family, he told us straight that Zuma called me and told me to do this and that for the Guptas, those are the people I respect, even if there was no way they could prove their accusations I still find them credible.
De Ruyter has simply not passed the test of credibility as far as his accusations about the high ranking ministers looting Eskom are concerned, it's as simple as that, no matter what Daily Maverick says, until such a time he owns up to his accusations.
Yeah, you and me are also more credible than Mantashe. What an excellent bar to compare against, hey ?De Ruyters claims certainly have more credibility than Mantashes ones against him. Yet one still has their job and you seem to be upset more with De Ruyter than Gwede.
Well, no chance now of De Ruyter being appointed as a Minister, so there is nothing I can do about it.De Ruyters claims certainly have more credibility than Mantashes ones against him. Yet one still has their job and you seem to be upset more with De Ruyter than Gwede.
Yeah, you and me are also more credible than Mantashe. What an excellent bar to compare against, hey ?
Well, no chance now of De Ruyter being appointed as a Minister, so there is nothing I can do about it.
Didn't take you as ADR worshipper. Interesting.
@ToxicBunny It has begun.It's behind a paywall and it's talking about him briefing the commissioner on corruption at Eskom, that doesn't interest me much, was the corruption particularly involving the ANC ministers part of that?
Wasn't your argument (or one of them anyway) about why didn't he go to the authorities apparently? And now we know he did, that he went to the national police commissioner.that doesn't interest me much, was the corruption particularly involving the ANC ministers part of that?
I'd rather wait for the top-seller "The Insurmountable Chip on my Shoulder" by the Perth Braai Spymaster...Won't you wait for the book ? "How I was crucified like Jesus just because of my skin color" penned by modern day William Wallace
My point is that allegedly corrupt (since he is not proven guilty yet) Mantashe cannot possibly be used as any benchmark unless it is corruption benchmark.Yes a great bar, the man is only in a high level government position. Much goodness.
There.@ToxicBunny It has begun.
Wasn't your argument (or one of them anyway) about why didn't he go to the authorities to report the Minister or ministers involved in Eskom corruption apparently? And now we know he did, that he went to the national police commissioner.
But anyway, you need to up your reasonable explanation game.
afrinuus.com
When did he do this?![]()
PAS BEKEND | André de Ruyter lê verklaring by die SAPD af
André de Ruyter, voormalige uitvoerende hoof van Eskom, het volgens News24 generaal Fannie Masemola, nasionale polisiekommissaris, persoonlik ingelig oor bewerafrinuus.com
July 2022 according to the article. The narrative now is 'weren't aware of any names'.When did he do this?
News 24 = pay walled.
A second briefing on 10 July 2022 was attended by Mufamadi and Gordhan, and the names of the two senior officials allegedly linked to the cartels in Mpumalanga were shared again.
Despite this, Mufamadi denied he was told the names.
My point is that allegedly corrupt (since he is not proven guilty yet) Mantashe cannot possibly be used as any benchmark unless it is corruption benchmark.
ADR may have the best intentions (in eskom and post eskom) but so far by not revealing any names, he is exactly acting like 'I am gonna spill the beans' guy we all know. If there any beans he spilled to police, at least present that evidence. Nearly everyone agrees there is huge corruption in government but apart from that, what have you really learnt from all his affidavits? Any names yet?
I also know lot of things but I fear for my life coz Babita Deokaran tactic is not going to work.
FFS - Mantashe is absolutely corrupt - why TF are you guys using him as any kind of benchmark.Lol so your argument is we dont have any criticism for Matashe because hes crap but for De Ruyter we do because he is good? I struggle to fathom this.