Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
buka001 said:
The US released new photos of their new stealth bomber today.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1633177074063273984

Meanwhile Russia is pressing 60 year old tanks and APC's into battle and using WW1 siege warfare tactics.
Click to expand...
Shame they will probably use it when they invade the next small country that has gas and oil reserves. Huffing and Puffing since WW2 ended but never attacked Russia directly with their superior weapons , according to you. It was nice to drop nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians when you where the only that had them. Like the weasels they are , they never attacked or invaded a country that have nuclear weapons.
 
tetrasect said:
And what would be the benefit, to the state, of convincing the Russian people that starting aggressive wars is a good thing?
Click to expand...
Post hoc rationalization.

This goes for all state and public msm. They act and then justify their actions after the fact.
 
HideInLight said:
On twitter, I got like 5 accounts suspended for spreading false information and inciting violence, but all they have to do is delete a 4 month old tweet and they are active again. So they don't really become less.
Click to expand...
Lol trolling through months old tweets and reporting it. Then bragging on another forum about how you don't have a life.
 
Gramps66 said:
Shame they will probably use it when they invade the next small country that has gas and oil reserves. Huffing and Puffing since WW2 ended but never attacked Russia directly with their superior weapons , according to you. It was nice to drop nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians when you where the only that had them. Like the weasels they are , they never attacked or invaded a country that have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
But where do you get the notion that people condemning Russia's instigation of the conflict in the Donbas and Crimea and their subsequent invasion and attempt to annex these regions, are pro-US atrocities?

And why would the US invade Russia when Russia can go into self-destruction mode on their own? Russia without nuclear weapons is no match for any country with same size military.
 
Last edited:
Gramps66 said:
Shame they will probably use it when they invade the next small country that has gas and oil reserves. Huffing and Puffing since WW2 ended but never attacked Russia directly with their superior weapons , according to you. It was nice to drop nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians when you where the only that had them. Like the weasels they are , they never attacked or invaded a country that have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
Of weasels gramps, you sit there bitching about the USA, but are quite happy to support them economically.
Time for some introspection on that hypocrisy perhaps?
 
rietrot said:
Lol trolling through months old tweets and reporting it. Then bragging on another forum about how you don't have a life.
Click to expand...
I reported a few tweets relating to the "abandoned shopping mall" Russia bombed the week it happened (Putting in a youtube link of people spending the day shopping there the day before), also some calls for genocide for good measure.

I got a response months later that their accounts were suspended, even though they were posting normally when I checked again. The message I got about the suspension mentions the account is locked until they delete the tweet. And that's what they did.
So you report something, action is taken 5 months later, they delete that old tweet and they back to being a disgusting lying pos. Even the ones that call for genocide is let back in the moment they delete an old tweet.
 
Rubilacxe said:
OSINT!

LMGTFY - Let Me Google That For You

For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.
bfy.tw bfy.tw
Click to expand...

No bud, it doesn't work that way because google algorithms will never give two people the same source at the top and no two people use the same phrase to search. The reason sources need to be provided. Then there's this cop out:

Q - Do you have evidence for that:
A - What? Don't you know how to google?

If you make the claim, you provide the evidence. Standard evidential debating principle. Even in courts of law.
 
Last edited:
Gramps66 said:
Shame they will probably use it when they invade the next small country that has gas and oil reserves. Huffing and Puffing since WW2 ended but never attacked Russia directly with their superior weapons , according to you. It was nice to drop nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians when you where the only that had them. Like the weasels they are , they never attacked or invaded a country that have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...

Afghanistan had oil and gas reserves?

And nuking fascist Japan? F##jk yes

Btw, no country with nuclear weapons has ever attacked another country with nuclear weapons.

And Russians have invaded many countries as well. You can bring up Iraq etc., but like your mates always neglect to mention that the UN Security Council which includes Russia and China signed off on Iraq and the US was not the only country involved in the Iraq wars. Did Russia even bring any grievances against Ukraine to the UN? No. They openly denied any plans to invades Ukraine.

But of course you need to only focus on one in order distract from the fact that Russia has invaded Ukraine and is bombing civilians NOW. So you aren’t really opposed to one country randomly invading another and the targeting of civilians. Your Russians friends according to you get a pass.
 
Last edited:
HideInLight said:
I reported a few tweets relating to the "abandoned shopping mall" Russia bombed the week it happened (Putting in a youtube link of people spending the day shopping there the day before), also some calls for genocide for good measure.

I got a response months later that their accounts were suspended, even though they were posting normally when I checked again. The message I got about the suspension mentions the account is locked until they delete the tweet. And that's what they did.
So you report something, action is taken 5 months later, they delete that old tweet and they back to being a disgusting lying pos. Even the ones that call for genocide is let back in the moment they delete an old tweet.
Click to expand...
Okay Karen
 
Gramps66 said:
Shame they will probably use it when they invade the next small country that has gas and oil reserves. Huffing and Puffing since WW2 ended but never attacked Russia directly with their superior weapons , according to you. It was nice to drop nuclear bombs on Japanese civilians when you where the only that had them. Like the weasels they are , they never attacked or invaded a country that have nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...

Well, I notice the USA and the Russians were allies in WW2 and the Russians never opposed the dropping of nuclear weapons on Japan. Neither have the Russians ever attacked a country that has nuclear weapons. They waited for Ukraine to dismantle theirs before attacking it. And Russia also suggested to the US that an immediate first strike by the US be done on South Africa when it developed nuclear weapons in the late 1970's.

And you think the war in Ukraine is about Nazis, Satanists or because the Russians care about the Ukrainian people they feel should be Russian? Could it be wheat and oil rather? Same reason the Germans attacked Ukraine in WW2.

By the way, the "I hate the USA" thread is that way --->

 
buka001 said:
The US released new photos of their new stealth bomber today.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1633177074063273984

Meanwhile Russia is pressing 60 year old tanks and APC's into battle and using WW1 siege warfare tactics.
Click to expand...
The B21 made it's big reveal a couple of months ago so I don't know what this is supposed to be pushing. As I stated back then, I was hoping that it would be a little more dramatic in its look because it looks a damn lot like the B2.

As for the tactics of the Ruskies, siege warfare has been proven time and time again to be extremely effective even though it is quite devastating and leaves nothing usable behind. Just like the US that uses airstrikes and long range strikes. They don't waiver from that approach either. Each country picks their own strategy and usually sticks with it and hopefully hones it over the years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X