Russian jet collides with US drone in international airspace over Black Sea, official says

Dave said:
Crimea is legally Ukraine, Russia has unlawfully annexed it, that's even accepted by the UN, Russia has no legal right to the territory or international waters/airspace that border Crimea.
Click to expand...
false, there was a referendum and observers refused to monitor the referendum, that's not Russia's problem

they covered all the legal bases, if someone wants to challenge it they can, but no, what they rather do is just label something as illegitimate ...
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
false, there was a referendum and observers refused to monitor the referendum, that's not Russia's problem

they covered all the legal bases, if someone wants to challenge it they can, but no, what they rather do is just label something as illegitimate ...
Click to expand...
Ummm no they didn't, but that doesn't fit with your narrative so you'll just ignore it.
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
false, there was a referendum and observers refused to monitor the referendum, that's not Russia's problem

they covered all the legal bases, if someone wants to challenge it they can, but no, what they rather do is just label something as illegitimate ...
Click to expand...

False, the referendum was rigged and not accepted by anyone other than Russia and its stooges.

Even the UNGA passed a resolution against the unlawful referendum.
 
was the russian jet damaged? some ballsy flying to bring it down due to 'accident'
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
not half as much as yours


what the footage does not show is more important than what it shows, you are incapable of accepting that it seems
Click to expand...
LOL

OK

You claim it is faked - Prove it.
You claim it is faked - Explain why it is faked, since both Russia and the USA have said it was caused by a Russian interdiction.
 
ToxicBunny said:
what doesn't it show that you think is important?
Click to expand...
He obviously fails to understand that the camera, which is on the underbelly of the drone, cannot see what happens on top of the drone (i.e. the point where the jet struck the drone).

I have no idea what he is trying to say really?
 
ToxicBunny said:
But it does show the moment of impact.... or are you blind?
Click to expand...
LMFAO, it shows a cutout of video and a resumption of video that all your rabid anti-Russia folk ASSUME is the moment of impact, it shows f-all of the impact itself, IF there even was one

so no, it does NOT
 
what are you all going on about? Russia brought down the drone. Would have preferred they just blew the damn thing out the sky, but ok, plausible accident provocation deniability I suppose.

America will Karen on, because we all know they only go to war away with poor, technologically handicapped countries, then make hollywood blockbusters about the heroes that participated.
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
LMFAO, it shows a cutout of video and a resumption of video that all your rabid anti-Russia folk ASSUME is the moment of impact, it shows f-all of the impact itself, IF there even was one

so no, it does NOT
Click to expand...

Bwahahaha you have gone completely off the deep end there sonnyboy.

"IF there even was one"!??? so now you don't even believe your Russian masters?
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
LMFAO, it shows a cutout of video and a resumption of video that all your rabid anti-Russia folk ASSUME is the moment of impact, it shows f-all of the impact itself, IF there even was one

so no, it does NOT
Click to expand...
It can't, because there is no camera on the top watching the point of impact.

Plus a big jet over the head of the drone, blocking its satellite link will obviously interrupt said satellite link.

So we have a loss in footage at the exact moment we see the jet about to overpass the drone. After it passes and the satellite link is re-established we see that the propeller is damaged.

According to you, that is no proof of an impact?
 
buka001 said:
It can't, because there is no camera on the top watching the point of impact.
Click to expand...
the camera footage itself would move if the drone that it is attached to was hit

it doesn't just magically lose the feed without showing any jarring at all, that is simply too convenient coming from a nation that held up a vial of white powder to drag the UN into wars in the past
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
LMFAO, it shows a cutout of video and a resumption of video that all your rabid anti-Russia folk ASSUME is the moment of impact, it shows f-all of the impact itself, IF there even was one

so no, it does NOT
Click to expand...
ToxicBunny said:
Bwahahaha you have gone completely off the deep end there sonnyboy.

"IF there even was one"!??? so now you don't even believe your Russian masters?
Click to expand...

It would seem that @NarrowBandFtw had tunnel-vision due to a low blood sugar episode, and therefore completely missed spotting the bent propeller that appears in the video directly after the aircraft had been impacted.
 
White House Security Council Communications Coordinator John Kirby on the U.S. prospects of getting MQ-9: "We haven't gotten it." and I'm not sure we can. It fell very, very deep into the Black Sea. So we're still trying to see if it's possible to make any effort to get it. Maybe not. " "We're studying the footage from around the wreck."

"John, ask the New York Times for the phone number of the private Ukrainian company that American propaganda says blew up the Nord Stream pipelines very, very deep in the Baltic Sea." They are, judging by your papers, deep-flying specialists. "They will get it," Maria Zakharova advised.
https://twitter.com/GraphicW5/status/1636330880154181633/photo/1
Click to expand...
 
buka001 said:
He obviously fails to understand that the camera, which is on the underbelly of the drone, cannot see what happens on top of the drone (i.e. the point where the jet struck the drone).

I have no idea what he is trying to say really?
Click to expand...
come to my house and record a video with a handheld device, I will give you the mother of all PKs, out of sight of the camera, and we review the footage afterwards to see if the video has any jarring at all ...

deal?
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
come to my house and record a video with a handheld device, I will give you the mother of all PKs, out of sight of the camera, and we review the footage afterwards to see if the video has any jarring at all ...

deal?
Click to expand...
I get it. You are ignorant and you are applying the "God of the gaps" type theory to account for your ignorance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X