Took you@AlmightyBender @RanzB @ShaunSA would you like to pay for some consulting in how to count or how to google? Trying to reach product-market fit here![]()
Unknown = countless
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Took you@AlmightyBender @RanzB @ShaunSA would you like to pay for some consulting in how to count or how to google? Trying to reach product-market fit here![]()
He came up with 5 accusers which is countless and other countless incidents with these countless accusers. Send your apologies to @NarrowBandFtw right now.My google fu also led me to 3. Turning that to countless is not hyperbole.
Just admit you messed up on that one. It's not that hard
I outright stated countless was intentional and obvious hyperboleTook you12 hourscountless hours to type up this drivel.
Unknown = countlessWords mean nothing to you apparently, like when you don't know which word to use, like accept vs except
![]()
They are being ridiculous, unknown, countless, three, all the same thing really.I outright stated countless was intentional and obvious hyperbole
a bunch of dumbasses stated "three" is not reasonable to turn into hyperbole, those same dumbasses are the only ones who take countless to be literal in this instance, that is their problem, not mine
I'm merely pointing out it is not three but actually an unknown number
Unknown and countless is basically the same thing correct.They are being ridiculous, unknown, countless, three, all the same thing really.
I agree to disagree that you are right, wrong and partially informed.They are being ridiculous, unknown, countless, three, all the same thing really.
Let's test this:Unknown and countless is basically the same thing correct.
I outright stated countless was intentional and obvious hyperbole
a bunch of dumbasses stated "three" is not reasonable to turn into hyperbole, those same dumbasses are the only ones who take countless to be literal in this instance, that is their problem, not mine
I'm merely pointing out it is not three but actually an unknown number
Libtards like you just cannot hide the racism and homophilia or is it jealousyLet's test this:
It is unknown how many times rietrot has slurped on BBC
Therefore, rietrot has slurped on BBC countless times
You know... I'll allow it.
Sorry I can't hear you with the countless amounts of BBC in your mouth.Libtards like you just cannot hide the racism and homophilia or is it jealousy
When Silicon Valley Bank imploded last week, most of its 8,500 staff were still working remotely. “Some people worked from Miami, some moved to Las Vegas or a cabin in the woods and did the digital nomad thing,” said one former banker.
SVB’s total embrace of remote working was just one way in which the technology-focused lender diverged from its peers — a top-20 US bank with a culture that more closely resembled the Silicon Valley start-ups it served. Long after Wall Street ordered its bankers back to the office, the California-based lender’s chief executive, Greg Becker, at times worked from Hawaii, president Mike Descheneaux decamped to Florida, chief risk officer Laura Izurieta was based in a suburb of Washington and general counsel Mike Zuckert worked mostly from New York, according to several people close to the bank.
Last month, the bank acknowledged in its annual report that it “may experience negative effects of a prolonged work-from-home arrangement”. Yet SVB was prepared to take on extra risks to promote a culture that prized “empathy” for customers and staff, and at times prioritised innovation and growth at the expense of risk management, according to interviews with current and former workers.
SVB executives were also deeply committed to social justice, according to several of its ex-employees. “I almost felt like I was at work on a college campus,” said another former executive, who recalled weekly internal “TED talks” on social issues and classes on “how to make sure you were not committing a microaggression”.
I mentioned 2 dems and 2 reps just to be balanced in making my point.Only Obama was immune![]()
you forgot to mention the biggest war criminal and a human trafficker ? - that is what shaun means.I mentioned 2 dems and 2 reps just to be balanced in making my point.


These firms and their backers like to bathe in the warm glow of virtue – of woke, of environmentalism and of so-called effective altruism. This was certainly the case at SVB. It paraded the diversity of its board of directors – ticking every box in terms of race, gender and sexuality, while having just one member with experience of banking at high levels. It was committed to the shibboleths of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance rules) and showered money on climate-technology ventures. Indeed, SVB was such a big player in the green industry that, according to the Washington Post, ‘many major clean-tech companies… faced insolvency’ following SVB’s collapse, before the US government stepped in. These pseudo-progressive values also chime perfectly with the elites of Washington, Wall Street and Davos. They create the right ‘vibes’ around Silicon Valley’s ventures. This virtue-signalling not only masks the fundamental shakiness of these businesses, it also presents investing in them as some sort of moral endeavour.