F1 2023

Which team will take constructors in 2023?

  • Total voters
    179
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
The AM car looks really good in FA's hands, kinda feel sorry for my red team at the moment. In the end, well done to the AM for winning the appeal using rules that were made by people who don't understand it themselves.
 
Willie Trombone said:
How they can have such an ignorant bunch in charge of interpreting the rules to start with is beyond me. Sanity prevailed fortunately.
Click to expand...
The regulations need plain and clearer language and standardisation across the board. Car may not be "worked on" is interpreted as don't touch. Parc Ferme rules post race state "No intervention of any kind" which is interpreted as don't touch. Why the heck don't they just make the rules say "don't touch" then.
 
quovadis said:
The regulations need plain and clearer language and standardisation across the board. Car may not be "worked on" is interpreted as don't touch. Parc Ferme rules post race state "No intervention of any kind" which is interpreted as don't touch. Why the heck don't they just make the rules say "don't touch" then.
Click to expand...
Any reasonable person will understand that touching is not working on. If you don't want it touched, then you have to be specific.... And that's not hard at all. If he drives into the lolliop man does that count as the lollipop man touching the car?
 
Willie Trombone said:
Any reasonable person will understand that touching is not working on. If you don't want it touched, then you have to be specific.... And that's not hard at all. If he drives into the lolliop man does that count as the lollipop man touching the car?
Click to expand...
I agree but the stewards aren't exactly known for objective interpretation of the rules in recent times. It's evident that stewards need to either have regulatory training or there needs to be some form of assistance to stewards to ensure their enforcements are reasonably within the regulations.
 
quovadis said:
I agree but the stewards aren't exactly known for objective interpretation of the rules in recent times. It's evident that stewards need to either have regulatory training or there needs to be some form of assistance to stewards to ensure their enforcements are reasonably within the regulations.
Click to expand...
Probably also still the teams using undue influence.
 
quovadis said:
... there needs to be some form of assistance to stewards to ensure their enforcements are reasonably within the regulations.
Click to expand...
Apply an AI.
It may be an Artificial Intelligence but it is still more Intelligence than the Stewards are currently excersizing.
And it would be impartial and unimpeachable as it cant be bribed or influenced with anything other than data and facts.
 
My McLaren's finished the race. Suppose that's progress. This new wind tunnel better get results fast when it opens. Couldn't pass a Williams with the help of DRS, current car is rubbish
 
quovadis said:
The regulations need plain and clearer language and standardisation across the board. Car may not be "worked on" is interpreted as don't touch. Parc Ferme rules post race state "No intervention of any kind" which is interpreted as don't touch. Why the heck don't they just make the rules say "don't touch" then.
Click to expand...
Because the rules aren't written for commoners like us and have to cover loopholes? If you say "don't touch" they'll start making remote or automated adjustments to get around it.
 
Hamster said:
Because the rules aren't written for commoners like us and have to cover loopholes? If you say "don't touch" they'll start making remote or automated adjustments to get around it.
Click to expand...
I'm sure they can come up with something - it's their job after all. "Worked on" isn't exactly covering loopholes either which is evident by the reversal.
 
quovadis said:
He knows well enough that the combination of talent, the car and a bit of luck is all that's needed to unsettle Max's dominance especially early on in the season.
Click to expand...
Checo is an average driver at best, he is no match for Max and everybody knows it. Don't overrate his abilities because he has the best car, just check his nr of races and results. Did we all watch the same race where Checo started 1st and Max 15th? And he ender just a few seconds behind him?
Nobody cares if Checo have a good race or two during a season.
Don't believe me, go listen to the tone of Christian Horner's voice when congratulating Checo for the win on the radio and when congratulating Max for his 2nd place.
 
Jean Claude Vaaldamme said:
Checo is an average driver at best, he is no match for Max and everybody knows it. Don't overrate his abilities because he has the best car, just check his nr of races and results. Did we all watch the same race where Checo started 1st and Max 15th? And he ender just a few seconds behind him?
Nobody cares if Checo have a good race or two during a season.
Don't believe me, go listen to the tone of Christian Horner's voice when congratulating Checo for the win on the radio and when congratulating Max for his 2nd place.
Click to expand...
So it's just the car then? Cool.

But you ignored the actual argument I made unless you believe Talent PLUS car PLUS a bit of LUCK = Checo is the best driver?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X