US Politics: Bike tricks

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not a right but it's common practice. The invitation was extended to Trump.
Now you are backpeddling, and you are still wrong.
Trump was invited to testify at the grand jury. Testifying in a case does not make you part of the adversarial process. As a witness: you cannot make a case, you cannot state law, you cannot introduce your own evidence outside of your testimony. You can only answer the questions that are asked of you
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162...stify-grand-jury-new-york-criminal-indictment

For example, Trump's lawyer wouldn't be able to state to the jury as to why the piece of law that they are wanting to apply to Trump isn't correct.
 
Pretty sure I have a better understanding than you. The grand jury don't determine intent. If they hand down an indictment then Trump is charged and the rest of the process begins.
O I forgot, this is impeachment all over again. The left is getting all excited jst because Trump might be charged with something and then found not guilty.
 
If they're handing down an indictment he's done just that.
No, you're not understanding what is going on
Everyone, doj etc have all dropped this as it is literally a 'nothing burger' as you folks like to say, hell, he didn't even get fined like hillary or obama, thats how 'nothing' this is....
but there is one tds da who refuses to accept that, he demands that there be a crime and as such is trying to make it one. He can't do anything under the misdemeanor as time has expired, as such, he has to bend and break and fudge the laws to try fit a misdemeanor into a felony crime and charge it. That is what is going on. And given the 'I just wanna see him standing there cos it'll be cool jury' we've seen, odds are he'll get to charge it.... but it will be tossed out, trump gets to play victim, and tds'ers get laughed at
 
Now you are backpeddling, and you are still wrong.
Trump was invited to testify at the grand jury. Testifying in a case does not make you part of the adversarial process. As a witness: you cannot make a case, you cannot state law, you cannot introduce your own evidence outside of your testimony. You can only answer the questions that are asked of you
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162...stify-grand-jury-new-york-criminal-indictment

For example, Trump's lawyer wouldn't be able to state to the jury as to why the piece of law that they are wanting to apply to Trump isn't correct.
Nope. You're getting ahead of yourself. If the grand jury hand down an indictment and Trump is charged the defense can submit a motion for a dismissal.
 
No, you're not understanding what is going on
Everyone, doj etc have all dropped this as it is literally a 'nothing burger' as you folks like to say, hell, he didn't even get fined like hillary or obama, thats how 'nothing' this is....
but there is one tds da who refuses to accept that, he demands that there be a crime and as such is trying to make it one. He can't do anything under the misdemeanor as time has expired, as such, he has to bend and break and fudge the laws to try fit a misdemeanor into a felony crime and charge it. That is what is going on. And given the 'I just wanna see him standing there cos it'll be cool jury' we've seen, odds are he'll get to charge it.... but it will be tossed out, trump gets to play victim, and tds'ers get laughed at
Federal law is separate to state law and clearly if there is an indictment blame the grand jury.
 
9fc.png
paww2hjmy6pa1.jpg
 
yet here you are as a confused leftist with TDS now pretending Trump committed some great sin.

1. I love how anyone who doesn't agree with the Rietie opinion is leftist :ROFL:.

2. Where have I even suggested it's some great sin? I am here to have a good laugh at the arrogant orange man baby being humiliated, because it's going to be fun.
 
1. I love how anyone who doesn't agree with the Rietie opinion is leftist :ROFL:.

2. Where have I even suggested it's some great sin? I am here to have a good laugh at the arrogant orange man baby being humiliated, because it's going to be fun.
Stupid libtard takes like this is leftist
 
I still don't know what is the (possible) "charge"?

pay for sex? :p
Hush money that they say Trump paid, yet Cohen went to jail for paying the hush money.

Bit interesting that they sent Cohen to jail for a crime that they are now saying Trump did.

Apparently it's something to do with crooking books.
 
Hush money that they say Trump paid, yet Cohen went to jail for paying the hush money.

Bit interesting that they sent Cohen to jail for a crime that they are now saying Trump did.

Apparently it's something to do with crooking books.
hush money? illegal in US?

that is what I don't understand.

tucker explained that already,

up to now, no one knows what the charge will be.
 
hush money? illegal in US?

that is what I don't understand.

tucker explained that already,

up to now, no one knows what the charge will be.
I've already watched Robert Barnes say how ridiculous this all is.

It's the "knowingly falsifying business records" that's the actual crime or something.
 
hush money? illegal in US?

that is what I don't understand.

tucker explained that already,

up to now, no one knows what the charge will be.
Don't they have videos of Hunter Biden banging hookers and doing drugs? Or no crime, crime, crime there?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X