South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
So you can accept that if the Russians are invading and walk up to your door to kidnap your kids, you should fight them?
What is a more effective way that families in Ukraine can be defended, from an invading Russian force?
Why did the UK fight back after Nazi Germany attacked them?
Why didn't they just let them take over the UK? It would have saved lives?
Would you want to live in a country proxy controlled by Putin's Russia, will all the limits on freedoms that would entail?
I would never presume to tell people that they should or should not risk their lives to defend their country, that is entirely their own choice to make.
Am sure some people have left Ukraine with their families, others clearly think that the best future for their families is in a Ukraine not controlled by Russia. And they are willing to risk their lives to try to make that future real.
So this video is a military target then?What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.
Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.
I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.
Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.
Russia has admitted to kidnapping Ukrainian children. They said so in the UN and are holding them as hostages to push for concessions.What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.
Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.
I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.
Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
Russia has admitted to kidnapping Ukrainian children. They said so in the UN and are holding them as hostages to push for concessions.
Civilians were killed in Bucha in the first month of the invasion.
In the first week of the invasion, a hospital was bombed by the Russians. Various civilian targets were hit by Russian cruise missiles in cities all over Ukraine on the very first day.
Perhaps you missed all of those?
If there are no limitations, then why did Russia attack Ukraine over their desire to join NATO?What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.
Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.
I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.
Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
Sounds like a drunk teenager ranting about his winnings in call of duty.
That NATO border is getting really close to St Petersburg and Moscow.
Nobel peace prize winners support Ukraine in their mission to kick Russia out.What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.
When a report for misinformation succeeds, the twitter account is locked until they delete offending tweet. So it could be because of that also. Normally it takes months before the report is even looked at, but NAFO seems to have had a victory, or Russia decided to take the L, for their disgusting attempt.
Russia has admitted to kidnapping Ukrainian children. They said so in the UN and are holding them as hostages to push for concessions.
Civilians were killed in Bucha in the first month of the invasion.
In the first week of the invasion, a hospital was bombed by the Russians. Various civilian targets were hit by Russian cruise missiles in cities all over Ukraine on the very first day.
Perhaps you missed all of those?
If there are no limitations, then why did Russia attack Ukraine over their desire to join NATO?
Why are they issuing threats to Armenia?
![]()
Russia warns Armenia against allying with ICC after Putin arrest warrant - RIA
Russia has warned Armenia of "serious consequences" if it submits to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) which has issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin, the RIA news agency reported on Monday.www.reuters.com
Tying people up and shooting them is collateral damage. ??Collateral damage is unfortunate occurrence of any military conflict or you really think that Russia wants to waste rockets on civilian buildings/cyclists? if so, i can't help you.
www.rferl.org
If that example was isolated maybe but we can post pages and pages of videos of cluster munitions landing in civilian areas with military present.Collateral damage is unfortunate occurrence of any military conflict or you really think that Russia wants to waste rockets on civilian buildings/cyclists? if so, i can't help you.
Apart from hearsay, please share where they "said so"?
Don't take bits and pieces out of my comment. I specifically mentioned at an individual level, obviously every world power is pursuing their political and economic influence.
Tying people up and shooting them is collateral damage. ??
![]()
Bucha Residents Describe 'Systematic' Killings By Russian Troops
Residents of this suburb of Kyiv told RFE/RL they managed to survive the "systematic" killing of the town's population by Russian troops that until recently occupied the area.www.rferl.org
If that example was isolated maybe but we can post pages and pages of videos of cluster munitions landing in civilian areas with military present.