Russo-Ukrainian War - 2022 Edition - Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
So you can accept that if the Russians are invading and walk up to your door to kidnap your kids, you should fight them?

What is a more effective way that families in Ukraine can be defended, from an invading Russian force?

What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.


Why did the UK fight back after Nazi Germany attacked them?

Why didn't they just let them take over the UK? It would have saved lives?

Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.

Would you want to live in a country proxy controlled by Putin's Russia, will all the limits on freedoms that would entail?

I would never presume to tell people that they should or should not risk their lives to defend their country, that is entirely their own choice to make.

Am sure some people have left Ukraine with their families, others clearly think that the best future for their families is in a Ukraine not controlled by Russia. And they are willing to risk their lives to try to make that future real.

I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.
Guess you missed my post from yesterday...


Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
 
What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.




Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.



I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.


Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
So this video is a military target then?

Source
 
What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.

Stop talking nonsense, please.

The second day of the invasion there were verifiable instances of civilians being murdered.


 
What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.




Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.



I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.


Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
Russia has admitted to kidnapping Ukrainian children. They said so in the UN and are holding them as hostages to push for concessions.

Civilians were killed in Bucha in the first month of the invasion.

In the first week of the invasion, a hospital was bombed by the Russians. Various civilian targets were hit by Russian cruise missiles in cities all over Ukraine on the very first day.

Perhaps you missed all of those?
 
Russia has admitted to kidnapping Ukrainian children. They said so in the UN and are holding them as hostages to push for concessions.

Civilians were killed in Bucha in the first month of the invasion.

In the first week of the invasion, a hospital was bombed by the Russians. Various civilian targets were hit by Russian cruise missiles in cities all over Ukraine on the very first day.

Perhaps you missed all of those?

But no, Russia said they were being nice...

Just ignore all the rockets/missiles/military men doing dastardly things, they just wanted to peacefully subjugate the country and absorb it into their own.
 
What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.




Because when it comes to a full blown world conflict, you are forced to pick a side.



I hear your point and lets look at other examples of proxy controlled countries, like Kazakhstan or Chechnya. From individual point of view there is no limitations imposed on them- you either working on the pipeline that supplies Russia or the West, it doesnt make a difference.
If there are no limitations, then why did Russia attack Ukraine over their desire to join NATO?

Why are they issuing threats to Armenia?


Oh yes, the leaked spy documents from unbiased "sunflower" source.
 
What are you talking about? There was no intention to bring any civilian casualties, it was purely a blitzkrieg to seize power, if you watch some videos of the first days, you see how there was no offensive on civilians or infrastructure.
Nobel peace prize winners support Ukraine in their mission to kick Russia out.

 
When a report for misinformation succeeds, the twitter account is locked until they delete offending tweet. So it could be because of that also. Normally it takes months before the report is even looked at, but NAFO seems to have had a victory, or Russia decided to take the L, for their disgusting attempt.
Interesting how their UK embassy is going with the muslim angle, while mfa goes for the old Nazi narrative.
It's blatantly clear what they are trying to do, those leaked documents gave away quite a bit of their strategy.

Meanwhile Russia is sorry that their lies and deception wasn't good enough, they promise to put more effort into their lies :rolleyes:
 
So this video is a military target then?

Source

Collateral damage is unfortunate occurrence of any military conflict or you really think that Russia wants to waste rockets on civilian buildings/cyclists? if so, i can't help you.

Russia has admitted to kidnapping Ukrainian children. They said so in the UN and are holding them as hostages to push for concessions.

Civilians were killed in Bucha in the first month of the invasion.

In the first week of the invasion, a hospital was bombed by the Russians. Various civilian targets were hit by Russian cruise missiles in cities all over Ukraine on the very first day.

Perhaps you missed all of those?

Apart from hearsay, please share where they "said so"?
If there are no limitations, then why did Russia attack Ukraine over their desire to join NATO?

Why are they issuing threats to Armenia?

Don't take bits and pieces out of my comment. I specifically mentioned at an individual level, obviously every world power is pursuing their political and economic influence.
 
Collateral damage is unfortunate occurrence of any military conflict or you really think that Russia wants to waste rockets on civilian buildings/cyclists? if so, i can't help you.
Tying people up and shooting them is collateral damage. ??

 
Collateral damage is unfortunate occurrence of any military conflict or you really think that Russia wants to waste rockets on civilian buildings/cyclists? if so, i can't help you.



Apart from hearsay, please share where they "said so"?


Don't take bits and pieces out of my comment. I specifically mentioned at an individual level, obviously every world power is pursuing their political and economic influence.
If that example was isolated maybe but we can post pages and pages of videos of cluster munitions landing in civilian areas with military present.
 
Tying people up and shooting them is collateral damage. ??


We don't have enough information or actually evidence to draw conclusions on Bucha, so I wont comment as propaganda is strong on both sides. Im more looking at it holistically and Putin's narrative for Ukraine.
 
If that example was isolated maybe but we can post pages and pages of videos of cluster munitions landing in civilian areas with military present.

I agree with you, russians don't seem to be the most accurate shooters and it goes back to my first comment why not allow them to take the government over and avoid the casualties and cities being erased to the ground.

Outsiders say Russia/Georgia conflict was pathetic, but millions of people there who still have their families and homes and carry with their lives peacefully would have a different opinion on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X