South Africa Bans Arms Sales to Poland in Support of Russian Interests

Keep on banning it. Some things our leaders are bang on right. Here a local prof explains it to ya.The USA is like a bouncer in a nightclub:laugh:
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
and who said they did? I believe you lot who pray to the logical fallacy gods call that a straw man ...


which was not the argument at the time, the argument was that the west is "not really arming Ukraine, because it is defensive weapons", complete hogwash


sure if you make up imaginary arguments that never happened you can claim a victory that never happened as well, see above for the correct context where you were in fact wrong


yes, another one where you are wrong, claiming proof where all you have is belief


I have no doubt that there are many other examples of you being wrong or blatantly biased and pretending otherwise, agreed
Click to expand...

How was it completely hogwash, if that was exactly what the rockets were supplied for and used for?

So it was a point I was 100% correct on and you were wrong, because you followed the Russian propaganda view on the matter.
 
Interesting how the same people that ridicule others for "die rooi gevaar" and "die swart gevaar".... now are peddling "die regse gevaar".
 
buka001 said:
How was it completely hogwash, if that was exactly what the rockets were supplied for and used for?

So it was a point I was 100% correct on and you were wrong, because you followed the Russian propaganda view on the matter.
Click to expand...
omfg, get a grip, there is no such thing as a purely defensive weapon, period
you will always be wrong if you try to assert an irrefutably false statement

how about all those HIMARS rockets fired into civilian territory ... supplied only for fighting Russia according to you?

you've ventured too far off the reservation son, time to head back to civilisation methinks ...
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
omfg, get a grip, there is no such thing as a purely defensive weapon, period
you will always be wrong if you try to assert an irrefutably false statement

how about all those HIMARS rockets fired into civilian territory ... supplied only for fighting Russia according to you?

you've ventured too far off the reservation son, time to head back to civilisation methinks ...
Click to expand...
Lol, the fact that those rockets have only been used to defend against a Russian invasion is so inconvenient for your narrative. You just can't deal with it.

HIMARS is different and was only supplied several months after Russia had invaded. So your distraction from how wrong you were is an ignoble attempt, but won't work.

NLWAS were only used for defending Ukraine's territory, inside Ukraine against invading Russian tanks. Exactly what I said they would be used for.

You were wrong because you recited Russian propaganda. Russian propaganda worked hard to undermine attempts to support Ukraine in being able to defend itself against a Russian invasion. Less NLAWS meant fewer Russian tanks would be destroyed.

The fact that you and the Russian propaganda were so against the supply of these missiles was instrumental in convincing me the invasion was imminent.

I use your posts as a yardstick to judge how truthful an event involving Russia is. The more you deny it, the more you sync with Russian propaganda, the more I believe whatever it is that you are fighting against is true.

That is why I know Bucha was perpetrated by the Russians.
 
buka001 said:
Lol, the fact that those rockets have only been used to defend against a Russian invasion is so inconvenient for your narrative. You just can't deal with it.

HIMARS is different and was only supplied several months after Russia had invaded. So your distraction from how wrong you were is an ignoble attempt, but won't work.

NLWAS were only used for defending Ukraine's territory, inside Ukraine against invading Russian tanks. Exactly what I said they would be used for.

You were wrong because you recited Russian propaganda. Russian propaganda worked hard to undermine attempts to support Ukraine in being able to defend itself against a Russian invasion. Less NLAWS meant fewer Russian tanks would be destroyed.

The fact that you and the Russian propaganda were so against the supply of these missiles was instrumental in convincing me the invasion was imminent.

I use your posts as a yardstick to judge how truthful an event involving Russia is. The more you deny it, the more you sync with Russian propaganda, the more I believe whatever it is that you are fighting against is true.

That is why I know Bucha was perpetrated by the Russians.
Click to expand...
nuclear level copium :ROFL:
 
Dave said:
I think Russia has cornered the world market for copium in the last year...
Click to expand...
Russia is not going apeshyte on internet forums getting opposing opinions banned to create an echo chamber

I'd say those actions are solidly in the copium spectrum, wouldn't you agree?
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
Russia is not going apeshyte on internet forums getting opposing opinions banned to create an echo chamber

I'd say those actions are solidly in the copium spectrum, wouldn't you agree?
Click to expand...

You haven’t heard about the Russian bot farms and cyber interference in other countries?

Where you been?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X