New NASA Director Swears Oath on Carl Sagan Book Instead of Bible

RazedInBlack

RazedInBlack
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
38,273
Reaction score
6,850
Location
<Cape Town>
nasa-director-sagan-swearing-in.jpg

If you look closely at the photo that accompanies NASA's press release about the new director of the Goddard Space Flight Center, you'll see something both curious and delightful — that she's taking her oath not on the Bible, or any other conventional holy book, but on a copy of Carl Sagan's 1994 "Pale Blue Dot."

Indeed, as NASA Watch's Keith Cowing spotted following Dr. Makenzie Lystrup's swearing in last Friday, the first woman ever to lead the Maryland space center marked the occasion with a nod to that other star enthusiast, the late Sagan.

"Normally I just pass on these staged pics," Cowing wrote. "But people have noticed something unusual about this photo."

While Lystrup's choice of oath-taking literature is "unusual," it's definitely allowed by law thanks to our good ole' separation of church and state, and there's a long tradition of political statement-making via swearing in books.

From Dr. Suess to a Superman comic and any number of non-Christian religious texts, American political figures have for centuries been putting their beliefs on display by being sworn into office on books other than the Bible.

That said, this appears to be the first time someone's been sworn in on a Sagan book, and we're with Cowing when it comes to admiring Lystrup's oath book — which NASA, interestingly enough, chose not to mention in its own blog post.

"Why do I suddenly get the urge to apply for a job over in Maryland at Goddard?" quipped Cowing, himself a former NASA employee. "Anyone who does this has to be cool to work for."


 
Symbolism? What a waste of time. That's about as useful as ctrl-alt-del on a typewriter.

First of all, ctrl-alt-del on a typewriter would be awesome. Not sure what it would do but what could go wrong?

Anyway, back to the article. If she does not believe in God, yet admires Carl Sagan, then doing the oath on the pale blue dot means a lot more to her than the bible. Not believing in God and doing it on the bible is about as good as doing it on a roll of toilet paper.

I like what she did - means she is committed to the exploration of space, and if she waivers we can point pack to her oath. On the bible or any other religious book would have been meaningless.
 
First of all, ctrl-alt-del on a typewriter would be awesome. Not sure what it would do but what could go wrong?

Anyway, back to the article. If she does not believe in God, yet admires Carl Sagan, then doing the oath on the pale blue dot means a lot more to her than the bible. Not believing in God and doing it on the bible is about as good as doing it on a roll of toilet paper.

I like what she did - means she is committed to the exploration of space, and if she waivers we can point pack to her oath. On the bible or any other religious book would have been meaningless.
Not sure what believing in God has to do with an oath on the Bible. Quite the opposite if you actually read the thing, point being that it may as well be a pinkie promise.
 
Last edited:
Swearing on something is just symbolic and people can use whatever is meaningful or meaningless to them to swear on. Regardless of what you swore on you'll still be charged if you violate your oath of office and that's all that matters.
 
Swearing on something is just symbolic and people can use whatever is meaningful or meaningless to them to swear on. Regardless of what you swore on you'll still be charged if you violate your oath of office and that's all that matters.
Exactly my point, so why not just ask them to say yes or no on record... Or get a signature on paper in front of others. Why introduce a Bible, or symbolic tokens to start with as if the statement carries more weight?
 
Swearing on something is just symbolic and people can use whatever is meaningful or meaningless to them to swear on. Regardless of what you swore on you'll still be charged if you violate your oath of office and that's all that matters.
The rules of Wakanda works otherwise, for example Zuma got medical parole irrespective of what he swore on..
 
Well I might be alone in this but Saganites have always kinda creeped me out....
 
I think swearing on the Bible (or on any other religious text) is outdated.

Also, people pledging affirmations in the name of science are sus. After Covid and what is happening in gender, "science" is just not what it used to be.
 
Last edited:
I think swearing on the Bible (or on any other religious text is outdated).

Also, people pledging affirmations in the name of science are sus. After Covid and what is happening in gender, "science" is just not what it used to be.
People should have caught on a century ago when references to "the science of Socialism" started popping up.....
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X