Wut
Executive Member
He is projecting
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
He is projecting
They still get to be part of the Caterpillar Club though.The sad part since both the A-10 and F-15E doesn't use Martin-Bakers there is no ties and watches for them.
It is a real pity that none of their allies besides the rebel groups are able to publicly assist them while Israel and America are free to gang up on them, this war would not have lasted this long.They want Irans allies to stop supporting Iran while they keep deploying reinforcements... cry me a river LOL
It disproved your claim thoughWell that's interesting, though not even vaguely conclusive to what your source claims.
A pilot using an ejection seat doesn't get rushed back into service.
The ultimate food-based president.
No questions still doesn't prove your rumour though.It disproved your claim though![]()
Again, you are missing the point.there's a vast chasm of a difference between defences put in place to protect you against an unprovoked attack vs "defences" put in place to protect yourself from your own psychotic warmongering
guess which type Israel has
Again, you are missing the point.
The original question is about intent. The hypothesis that you are going on is that Iran is this benevolent force, and that Israel and the US are pure evil. You back this up by using the missile strikes on that school etc.
The problem with this hypothesis is that you cannot prove intent/benevolence based on casualty numbers when one side has done everything possible to defend itself, and the other does nothing.
So much winning, when you have totally obliterated your enemy and enforced regime change, there is nothing wrong in releasing the frozen funds to the new, much friendlier and reasonable regime.
The heart smack in the middle?
US is denying it nowSo much winning, when you have totally obliterated your enemy and enforced regime change, there is nothing wrong in releasing the frozen funds to the new, much friendlier and reasonable regime.
Reuters?Oh god, the Iranian supporter's favourite "news source" is wrong again.
Can't be same one that claimed without any evidence whatsoever that the USA had agreed to Iran's 10 demands?
Say it ain't so...
![]()