We disagree, then.
The vast majority of people do not benefit from ongoing conflict and they know it.
Those who do benefit are vastly out-numbered.
There is a degree of a downward spiral following 'aggression' are interpreted as defensive force on both sides.
But willful mutual destruction on the part of the masses is, in real life, very expensive to maintain. Too expensive without a central bank and a world reserve currency to keep conflict artificially stimulated, military contractors being paid handsomely, and a few twisted souls to spin offense as defense who have no stomach for a level playing field, in peace-times.