South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
A fair system is where you pay by how much you drive. I insist on that if I have to pay for insurance.It is a fair system
Have insurance or stay the fsck off the road.
It isn't. That's only for damage cover.3rd party insurance is like R100 or R200 a month
Then don't drive if you can't afford 3rd party insurance.A fair system is where you pay by how much you drive. I insist on that if I have to pay for insurance.
It isn't. That's only for damage cover.
In some US states insurance is a requirement for registration. There is no requirement for renewing the license, why you have to carry it with you. If you get pulled over without insurance you get fined. If you cause an accident and are uninsured the state pays.That's exactly how it works in most states (US) and in the UK. Insurance is a requirement for licensing.
Pretty simple concept. If you don't have coverage and are responsible for damages and/or injuries you pay for your mistakes out of your pocket. If you get pulled over and you don't have coverage your vehicle is impounded until you pay a fine and insure your vehicle.
We can't rely on assumptions. Besides if there are such options it becomes non-standardised meaning some people will be underinsured.If there's a demand it will be offered.
I'm sorry but that is a bit snobbish to me. Just because someone doesn't need to or doesn't want to drive more than 50km a month doesn't mean they are a armgat who can't manage the upkeep of their vehicle. There are also plenty of people who can do it themselves.I have to wonder if people who can't afford even minimal insurance can afford to keep their vehicle in a roadworthy condition.
Waste steal waste steal waste steal waste steal waste stealTax tax tax tax tax tax tax tax tax...
Again a snobbish statement. I don't see why I have to pay hundreds or more to subsidise others. I already pay enough tax.The don't drive if you can't afford 3rd party insurance.
Third party insurance only covers vehicle damage. If it becomes a replacement for the RAF it would need to cover injury as well.What damage cover are you referring to?
Shame, if you can't afford it don't drive.Again a snobbish statement. I don't see why I have to pay hundreds or more to subsidise others. I already pay enough tax.
Third party insurance only covers vehicle damage. If it becomes a replacement for the RAF it would need to cover injury as well.
Licence in the South African context as it refers to vehicle licensing.some US states insurance is a requirement for registration. There is no requirement for renewing the license, why you have to carry it with you. If you get pulled over without insurance you get fined. If you cause an accident and are uninsured the state pays.
Please **** off snob.Shame, if you can't afford it don't drive.
Newsflash sparky. It won't be just R130-R230 a month.Then get personal liability cover for the rest, make it R130 to R230 a month.
How about you fsck off with demanding shyte that you can't afford and impact everyone else?Please **** off snob.
Newsflash sparky. It won't be just R130-R230 a month.![]()
That is not how it works in the US. Licensing is registering your vehicle.Licence in the South African context as it refers to vehicle licensing.
Or you pay your dues like you currently do without being subsidised by others. That was the whole e-toll debacle.How about you fsck off with demanding shyte that you can't afford and impact everyone else?
Shame.. I do, how about you do the same and get insurance, free loader.Or you pay your dues like you currently do without being subsidised by others. That was the whole e-toll debacle.
I have insurance, it's called RAF. That was the whole point behind it so you can't dodge it.Shame.. I do, how about you do the same and get insurance, free loader.
Vehicles are registered, or licensed in a SA vernacular, annually in the three states I've owned and operated vehicles in. Insurance was compulsory and mandatory for the annual registration. How did the procedure differ there for you?That is not how it works in the US. Licensing is registering your vehicle.
You also couldn't dodge compulsory 3rd party.I have insurance, it's called RAF. That was the whole point behind it so you can't dodge it.
That is not the info I'm getting, the whole reason you have to carry it with you otherwise that would be unnecessary.Vehicles are registered, or licensed in a SA vernacular, annually in the three states I've owned and operated vehicles in. Insurance was compulsory and mandatory for the annual registration. How did the procedure differ there for you?
And 3rd party was abolished precisely because it was unfair and inadequate.You also couldn't dodge compulsory 3rd party.
The magical world is compulsory.