How the chartered flight for Afrikaner refugees to the United States was approved

Status
Not open for further replies.
The gay thing goes so much deeper and this is a stupid argument to have with very superficial people on the internet but I'll try anyway.

There's much bigger geopolitical realignment happening in Africa between China Russia and the west.
There's some of these consulting groups and NGO especially the western ones like the Tony Blair Institute that for some retarded reason make being gay openly the be all and end all of human rights issues. They are exporting American culture war topics that don't even work in America to countries were it is completely irrelevant. It is being push politically @Sollie did spot that all of a sudden some people now care about the gays when they normally don't.

Ghana is interesting I guess. I don't know why yet or who's side they are on now. I don't really care that much about them.

It is still a version of the cold war playing out with alliances shifting. If there is one thing that's silly it is virtue signaling about gays in some country in Central Africa. There people have bigger problems and the gays will be fine if they keep their activities in their own bedroom/shack.
Perhaps the same special case reasoning should be applied to white afrikaaners here - special being the negative affects afrikaaner govt has on the people of this land.

There is a delicious irony tho - despite their rampant racism and "pious" mindset, the Afrikaaners managed to create an entirely new and unique race to our land.

The White Afrikaaners will be okay tho, but they should just sit in the corner and keep quiet.
 
Perhaps the same special case reasoning should be applied to white afrikaaners here - special being the negative affects afrikaaner govt has on the people of this land.

There is a delicious irony tho - despite their rampant racism and "pious" mindset, the Afrikaaners managed to create an entirely new and unique race to our land.

The White Afrikaaners will be okay tho, but they should just sit in the corner and keep quiet.
Why? Because of the sins of their fathers?
 
Perhaps the same special case reasoning should be applied to white afrikaaners here - special being the negative affects afrikaaner govt has on the people of this land.

There is a delicious irony tho - despite their rampant racism and "pious" mindset, the Afrikaaners managed to create an entirely new and unique race to our land.

The White Afrikaaners will be okay tho, but they should just sit in the corner and keep quiet.
And out runs the ANC cadre to blame the current state of things on Apartheid. How predictable.

We, the Afrikaners ended that in 1992 officially and had high hopes for this new rainbow nation.

The current state of things 30 years on is exactly because white Afrikaners took a back seat in the corner without saying much. Sometimes we ask how renaming everything will make life better for the poor? Or is all this corruption a good idea, maybe do some maintenance. Does the idea of policing crime or doing some maintenance offend you?
 
And out runs the ANC cadre to blame the current state of things on Apartheid. How predictable.

We, the Afrikaners ended that in 1992 officially and had high hopes for this new rainbow nation.

The current state of things 30 years on is exactly because white Afrikaners took a back seat in the corner without saying much. Sometimes we ask how renaming everything will make life better for the poor? Or is all this corruption a good idea, maybe do some maintenance. Does the idea of policing crime or doing some maintenance offend you?
Unfortunately, people also conveniently forget that Apartheid wasn't ended by the ANC or a black struggle, it was ended by a white vote the very first time whites were given an option to end the system.
 
Unfortunately, people also conveniently forget that Apartheid wasn't ended by the ANC or a black struggle, it was ended by a white vote the very first time whites were given an option to end the system.
Maybe it would have ended sooner if there was legitimate black representatives and the ANC wasn't a communist terrorist party in the middle of the cold war.
 
Maybe it would have ended sooner if there was legitimate black representatives and the ANC wasn't a communist terrorist party in the middle of the cold war.
Quiet possibly, the point is that as soon as the public was given the choice to end it, they did.
 
Unfortunately, people also conveniently forget that Apartheid wasn't ended by the ANC or a black struggle, it was ended by a white vote the very first time whites were given an option to end the system.
Serious? All along whites were not voting before the referendum? And did they not time and time again voted for apartheid?
 
Last edited:
Serious? All along when whites were not voting before the referendum? And did they not tone and time again voted for apartheid?
is it,.... do you have any idea of what you are talking about. There was no choice to end the system before the referendum, only what party to vote for under the system.
 
is it,.... do you have any idea of what you are talking about. There was no choice to end the system before the referendum, only what party to vote for under the system.
So you know the name of the party that's doing apartheid, you continue to vote for it and then still insists you had no option to end apartheid?

Is that how the high IQ logic is flowing?
 
Serious? All along when whites were not voting before the referendum? And did they not tone and time again voted for apartheid?
From at least the 70s everyone was in favour of ending Apartheid in some way. People of voting age back then are 80 today.

The only question ever was how do you end Apartheid without destroying South Africa.
 
So you know the name of the party that's doing apartheid, you continue to vote for it and then still insists you had no option to end apartheid?

Is that how the high IQ logic is flowing?
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about or the real history of this country, stop embarressing yourself.
 
So you know the name of the party that's doing apartheid, you continue to vote for it and then still insists you had no option to end apartheid?

Is that how the high IQ logic is flowing?
bru, they were equally oppressed (as much as bleks at times) in the old apartheid but in the new apartheid non-whites are not oppressed so they must vote for change.
 
is it,.... do you have any idea of what you are talking about. There was no choice to end the system before the referendum, only what party to vote for under the system.
Um, People could have voted for the DP or PFP - both opposed apartheid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Federal_Party

For its duration, it was the main parliamentary opposition to apartheid, instead advocating power-sharing in South Africa through a federal constitution. From the 1977 election until 1987 it was the official opposition of the country.
The Progressive Federal Party (PFP) was the official liberal, anti-apartheid opposition in South Africa's white-only parliament from 1977 to 1989. Formed by a merger of the Progressive and Reform parties, it advocated for universal suffrage, the rule of law, and a dismantled apartheid state
 
Nobody claimed this. Why do you always have to go full retard.
Well yes and no, many whites were not really aware of how badly blacks were really being treated by the state, the SABC was in full swing as the official propaganda machine and the narrative was carefully crafted to keep everyone in line. I wouldn't say white were oppressed, but they certainly were not really aware of the real truth nor did they have much say in what was being done.
 
Um, People could have voted for the DP or PFP - both opposed apartheid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Federal_Party
And a lot of people did vote for them. That's why they were the official opposition.

The same question remains. How do you do power sharing and democracy without destroying SA?
This is also around the time of Zimbabwe bush war and Mozambique collapsed.

Obviously people are going to look at that and say no, lets not share power with the terrorist that just bombed a wimpy.
 
Last edited:
And a lot of people did vote for them. That's why they were the official opposition.

The same question remains. How do you do power sharing and democracy without destroying SA?
This is also around the time of Zimbabwe bush war and Mozambique collapsed.

Obviously people are going to look at that and say no, lets not share power with the terrorist that just bombed a wimpy.
Or were attacking farmers, having decided they're part of the enemy, planting landmines on farm roads blowing up children.

Many years later, farm attacks that were started by the ANC, are still a thing.
 
Oh, I'm so glad that you're virtue signalling upset about some gays in Ghana ... but you're in the South African refugee thread.

Then you attack Riet, yet you were just yelped like a kicked puppy because I scoffed at your BS and expressed it in a hurty way?
Rieitie thinks that gay people should hide their sexuality to avoid getting persecuted rather than actually giving them equal rights., But instead of getting offended at that kind of BS attitude, you whine about me "attacking him" JFC, you have a go at people left right and centre for disagreeing with you but you clutch your pearls when someone calls someone you agree with wrong? Afrikaans people can be wrong too dude, don't take everything as a personal attack against your tribe.

So I'm asking you directly:

Are you friggin retarded?
Piss off with your selective outrage, you never bitch at anyone else about going off topic except the peeps who call you on your BS. You should look in a mirror and ask yourself the same question if a few extra comments in a thread of 8600 posts don't fully align with your narrow minded interpretation of what is "on topic"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X