US Politics: Full Transp██████

It's easy - you don't test anyone, then there are no positive cases.

That and Ivermectin.
uh oh

you are going to trigger the karens of covidia.

they will tell you with absolute certainty covid was a lie, and "big pharma" wiped out swathes of humanity with the "vax".
this they will tell you given the benefit of their years of academic training and decades of clinical practice in the fields of infectious disease & critical care.
 
uh oh

you are going to trigger the karens of covidia.

they will tell you with absolute certainty covid was a lie, and "big pharma" wiped out swathes of humanity with the "vax".
this they will tell you given the benefit of their years of academic training and decades of clinical practice in the fields of infectious disease & critical care.

I perished at least five times from the vaccine, as did just about everyone I know who wasn't a free thinker. It would have been worse, but being in London I had my head chopped off a few times before the vaccine could get me again.

Small mercies and all that.

I also believe that the whole Reflecting Pool debacle could have been resolved had people been allowed to dump Ivermectin into it. This is clearly Fauci and Biden's fault and also the fault of wokeness.
 
Yes. Just like I don't believe in companies that are "too big too fail" which emerged after 2008, but private businesses now know that if they are important enough, they will be bailed out by the government [see also Sil. I could support a bail out if it came with proper regulatory reform, but that is politically difficult to do.
I would say the bailout should come with equity surrender to the state to the value of the bailout, until such time their debtors and victims are repaid.
 
uh oh

you are going to trigger the karens of covidia.

they will tell you with absolute certainty covid was a lie, and "big pharma" wiped out swathes of humanity with the "vax".
this they will tell you given the benefit of their years of academic training and decades of clinical practice in the fields of infectious disease & critical care.
Amazing how big pharma killed millions of people before the Vax was even administered.
 
Not sure I'm following you. Are you trying to make the argument that the current state of capitalistic failure is not really a feature of capitalism and should therefore be disregarded from the framework?
Capitalism places shareholder return as the primary driver.

Without giving sustainability and social impact equal weight, it just incentivises extractio of wealth rather than building it though improved productivity.

Same thing happend in the 1880-1930 period for the same reasons as today. Too much short term thinking and wealth extraction for the benefit of the Oligachs (robber barons)

Communism in Russia had a similar result, but under a different structure. In that case it was not private capital extracting all the wealth, it was the state extracting the wealth for the benefit of the Oligarchs.
 
Amazing how big pharma killed millions of people before the Vax was even administered.

Those were all natural deaths and accidents and they just put a giant "COVID" stamp on the death certificate. As doctors do.
Then the vax came out and people started dying from the vax and the doctors kept putting the "COVID" stamps on the death certificates.
In fact nobody died from Covid, it's all accidents and vaccine deaths and natural deaths.

COVID actually stands for Conspiracy to Obfuscate Vaccine Injuries and Deaths.

PS I came to this realization after drinking DOG BLOOD.
 
Those were all natural deaths and accidents and they just put a giant "COVID" stamp on the death certificate. As doctors do.
Then the vax came out and people started dying from the vax and the doctors kept putting the "COVID" stamps on the death certificates.
In fact nobody died from Covid, it's all accidents and vaccine deaths and natural deaths.

COVID actually stands for Conspiracy to Obfuscate Vaccine Injuries and Deaths.

PS I came to this realization after drinking DOG BLOOD.
Ah, so the excess deaths were from TDS. Got it.
 
c27c82d1-38ca-4c63-9683-1cd7dab65afd.jpeg
 
Capitalism places shareholder return as the primary driver.

Without giving sustainability and social impact equal weight, it just incentivises extractio of wealth rather than building it though improved productivity.

Same thing happend in the 1880-1930 period for the same reasons as today. Too much short term thinking and wealth extraction for the benefit of the Oligachs (robber barons)

Communism in Russia had a similar result, but under a different structure. In that case it was not private capital extracting all the wealth, it was the state extracting the wealth for the benefit of the Oligarchs.
Oh I understand this perfectly. I also fully comprehend the reasons why some socialist systems imploded. They imploded because of the flaws that entered the system.

But the flaws that entered, cannot be excluded from the framework, as chris was trying to argue. They are simply a consequence of implementation and systemic evolution.
 
Oh I understand this perfectly. I also fully comprehend the reasons why some socialist systems imploded. They imploded because of the flaws that entered the system.

But the flaws that entered, cannot be excluded from the framework, as chris was trying to argue. They are simply a consequence of implementation and systemic evolution.

I think it's all about the power structure. The more concentrated the power, the more likely the system is to fail.
A system where people have a voice and a vote, where people can make educated decisions regarding the functioning of government (referendums etc), is also a system that lasts.

Communism cannot work since it relies on a small number of people to control the population. Capitalism in it's pure form cannot work because it concentrates wealth and power in the hands of a few.
 
Oh I understand this perfectly. I also fully comprehend the reasons why some socialist systems imploded. They imploded because of the flaws that entered the system.

But the flaws that entered, cannot be excluded from the framework, as chris was trying to argue. They are simply a consequence of implementation and systemic evolution.
There are always parties that seek to undermine any framework. So any framework will also need some guardrails and regulation to protect it, and make the neccesary exceptions.
 
Libtards defending Fauci :ROFL:

New low for the useful idiots peanut gallery
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X