Canal+ confirms rights for Springbok-All Blacks tour matches

And if you think about it Multichoice knows this. They know if they start unbundling people that follow only certain sports will downgrade to lower packages and they will lose revenue, so they force Grandstand, Golf, Tennis, Cricket and Rugby to premium only packages to have a more consistent revenue generation.
Actually, it would've been wiser for DSTV to do this, unbundled would end up costing people more. Especially when it comes to sport, the entertainment side would cost far less for people, but those who want sport would be paying the R500 to R800 a month for sport.
 
Actually, it would've been wiser for DSTV to do this, unbundled would end up costing people more. Especially when it comes to sport, the entertainment side would cost far less for people, but those who want sport would be paying the R500 to R800 a month for sport.

I think that is where they are getting it wrong also. Unbundle and make it cheaper like say DSTV Access as you bas package and add sport channels for R250 or so per channel and then still offer premium for R979.

That way you catch the whole market. People that watch everything will but premium and people that only want to watch certain sports will add those to their bundle.

It generates them extra revenue and people are happier they pay less. I don't think there will ever be a time where people are happy with prices.
 
I think that is where they are getting it wrong also. Unbundle and make it cheaper like say DSTV Access as you bas package and add sport channels for R250 or so per channel and then still offer premium for R979.

That way you catch the whole market. People that watch everything will but premium and people that only want to watch certain sports will add those to their bundle.

It generates them extra revenue and people are happier they pay less. I don't think there will ever be a time where people are happy with prices.
How could they add a sports package for R250, when you've just shown two that are higher and have less sports showing? One was a streaming package only and the other was a limited service as well.
So how can DSTV in any way do it for less than those? Cut sports, sure that could do something, limit to live viewing with some highlights?
 
Get a life.
wambulance-waaaa.gif
 
Exactly what I was thinking. What is the good news? Broadcasting something that you have done for decades at an expensive price to a limited population is not good news. not even news.
I think it's because people are getting nervous that these Frenchies with all their cost-cutting plans and dstv's struggles in SA will start to show less sport for SA viewers, but so far it's actually only been the Winter Olympics that were dropped.

Can't see them dropping Springbok rugby anytime soon (or ever) though.
 
I think it's because people are getting nervous that these Frenchies with all their cost-cutting plans and dstv's struggles in SA will start to show less sport for SA viewers, but so far it's actually only been the Winter Olympics that were dropped.

Can't see them dropping Springbok rugby anytime soon (or ever) though.
Yeah, that would be a stupid thing to do honestly. Though if they unbundle they might have some packages with high end rugby games and such.
 
I was thinking good news maybe they will show it on Access or something. So no good news. I don't think it was ever in doubt Supersport will show it because I mean in SA it's supersport or sabc that needs to broadcast with their equipment from the stadium.

Would be crazy if Supersport doesn't show it.
Has there ever been a Springbok game that Multichoice hasn't broadcast ? (since 94 at least)

More like - lucky for them they did get the rights because there would be mass cancelation if they didn't
 
I've started to think they may have done that as an experiment in cost cutting. Burnt their fingers nicely.... thank goodness.
Or just knew what does bring in revenue and what doesn't.
 
When it comes to Sports packages, I think its sometimes unfair to compare the pricing of the services like Stan, Sky, Peacock, etc. with Dstv. Remember, an American/European/Aussie earns in Dollars/Euro/Pound. So its relatively cheap for them to have a few services. We earn in Rands and so you can't really make a like for like comparison due to the exchange rate. That fact that dstv basically have an all or nothing package policy does not help the matter. I do however generally feel that we are ripped off here in SA and that comes down to no competition, especially with Rugby broadcasting rights. Were it not for the bad buffering I have experienced, I would have happily stayed with Stan and Peacock for my rugby fix.
 
I've started to think they may have done that as an experiment in cost cutting. Burnt their fingers nicely.... thank goodness.
Maybe. We'll only really know in 2030 with the next Winter Olympics if it was a once-off.
 
When it comes to Sports packages, I think its sometimes unfair to compare the pricing of the services like Stan, Sky, Peacock, etc. with Dstv. Remember, an American/European/Aussie earns in Dollars/Euro/Pound. So its relatively cheap for them to have a few services. We earn in Rands and so you can't really make a like for like comparison due to the exchange rate. That fact that dstv basically have an all or nothing package policy does not help the matter. I do however generally feel that we are ripped off here in SA and that comes down to no competition, especially with Rugby broadcasting rights. Were it not for the bad buffering I have experienced, I would have happily stayed with Stan and Peacock for my rugby fix.
Except DSTV pay for the rights in dollars, pounds, euros or whatever. It's not they get a 3rd country discount.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X