I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm claiming it is natural telepathy and real Aliens!

^^ Not going to try find it, but he was shown in one of his alien examples here that such a claim couldn't possibly be true.

Maybe ignoring would be doing the guy a favour.
What do you think @dabean (Dabean suffers from a similar condition).

Seeya
 
Of course it computes
It does not.

The fact that you've convinced yourself that this is a thing that happens is a you problem, not an us problem.

Local rules do not require teleological BS, or whatever your delusional BS is, to function.
 
So @talanum1 , the game's up - until you have real proof that can survive basic universally accepted knowledge on the subject, there's nothing you can say that can convince anyone here anymore to listen as you won't even learn what guides 99.9% on these subjects. Provable advanced knowledge gained in cooperation, in full public view, over centuries..... but you know better, because aliens.

Time to wake up and see that some part of your brain is conning you man, end of. Just like an ear or a kidney can be partially faulty.

Remember that if you go off and properly learn about something you don't agree with, and months or years later still don't agree with it, you could then walk away anyway. But first learn it properly, so you can debate it properly.
If you can't find ways to gain the knowledge, public use AI can still get you far.
Perhaps you'll even do it with medication and medical assistance to avoid getting self-trapped over and over again.

Maybe then you can stop spamming this forum, and join us in other things.
Some of us even believe in Aliens....


Choose the difficult thing, climb that mountain :)
Some of us will be listening if you ever want to talk about it.
 
Why don't you reach out to the numerous American organisations that has been around for decades, or even individuals such as Jeremy Corbell, James Fox, Steven Greer, George Knapp or simply MUFON.
What good would that do: I can't remember any of the happenings in the abductions.

It does not.
It does: how else is Nature to come to a decision to allow an interaction or not? If you say objects just responds to space and fields: that is still a computation.
 
Last edited:
Which is ya'll favorite biscuit? And if you had to have only 1 biscuit for the rest of your life, which would it be?

Fsckn more interesting than the schite going on in this thread
 
I need a South African organization name not American.
 
It does: how else is Nature to come to a decision to allow an interaction or not? If you say objects just responds to space and fields: that is still a computation.

Maybe you get confused by some factors of Quantum Mechanics. As such here's a FINAL response from my AI source


"You are confusing quantum probability with a digital CPU. When outside forces or observers alter a quantum outcome, Nature isn't 'making a new decision' or running a calculation. The incoming force physically alters the geometry of the field itself. A river doesn't 'compute' a new path when a boulder blocks it; the physical boundaries simply changed. Quantum interactions are the natural, inevitable geometry of fields responding to boundaries—no processing time or decision-making required."
 
One billiard ball colliding with another is a physical calculation. Same with an object reacting to a field.
 
One billiard ball colliding with another is a physical calculation. Same with an object reacting to a field.

Define calculating. It's a device designed for such purpose or person working out a puzzle or system, not so. How is a billiard ball going to do that?

Didn't you learn about action and reaction, simple Newtonian laws. Learned 340 years ago. Nature tends to go the route of simplicity, shortest distance between 2 points and that kind of thing.

Do you believe the billiard ball thinks?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X