SA Politics Part 14 - The New Dawn turns to Dusk

Hanging their comrade out to dry.

The Tribunal said that Makhanya did not act alone in allowing the project costs to balloon, but as architect and principal agent, he had a responsibility to prevent fruitless and wasteful expenditure.

Using this logic, can the public order municipal managers and other execs to repay costs flagged by AG as fruitless and wasteful expenditure? Who were responsible for this project at DPW? How did the architect authorise these additions alone?
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X