South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Well if you a psychopath wanting to see people getting killed, so be it. But a civilized society tries to prevent those things from hapening.
Lol you still need to learn the hard way. Mybb expits don't care, about proof or logic, this particular character you are getting down and dirty with in the mud, is a known troll and takes delight in posting to get a rise out of folks.....The sooner you leave him alone, the sooner he loses interest....Gosh, your truck analogy actually makes the opposite point. A kid can unexpectedly run into the road. the stadium isn't going to suddenly jump into the aircraft's path
This is why the flyover was planned, risk assessed and rehearsed in the first place.
watch the video below. He explains the risks and how they're managed far better than I care to. And then, perhaps, take your own advice and STFU.
Ag shame I thought a simple example would explain it. Guess I was wrong, should have drawn pictures. Many things can go wrong with the truck. A tire can burst or brakes can fail etc etc. But you chose to play more pigeon chess. Just the same many thing can go wrong for the plane. You chose again to play the fool and say the stadium cant jump into the plane. Pigeon chess if you have nothing.Gosh, your truck analogy actually makes the opposite point. A kid can unexpectedly run into the road. the stadium isn't going to suddenly jump into the aircraft's path
Look at you, believes everything he reads on the internet. Who did this? Who told you this? The airline itself that did this for a marketing stunt? Jassis you gullable.
It's the height over the stadium. One flew directly through the smoke, and the other was way lower and seemed from some angles to be at a genuine risk of a tail strike on the edge of the stadium. It's not about the size or speed of the planes.
It's about the fear of the people
Did the 747 go 12-15m over the stadium? No its was probably 10 times higher.
Give us a link to where there was flyovers this low in the sane rest of the country?
Maybe the rest of the country isn't walking around in hard hats afraid of the sky collapsing at any moment. Maybe we have appreciation for a well planned and executed task. Maybe we're not looking to complain over everything that makes us have a moment of joy in life.
I just asked a simple question. Where was other flyovers this low? No word salad, just facts?
I don't know of any. Perhaps you have better data then I do. But then again, what difference does it make? If there's risk in 15m flyover, there's risk in a 50m flyover too. It changes nothing in the equation.
tail strikes are a regular occurrence, and are seldom dangerous - most aircraft (including these) have a "tail bumper" protecting the tail and undercarriage in the event of impact.
