Sea Point residents await ruling on St Johns Road flats challenge

Grant

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
70,739
Reaction score
39,507
Location
Here, there & everywhere
A Western Cape High Court judge has reserved judgment in a challenge by Sea Point residents against the City of Cape Town’s approval of plans for a five-storey development on St Johns Road.
Residents dispute the required boundary setback, while the developers say the plans were lawfully approved.

He presided over the review application on Thursday, August 27, brought to court by applicant, Save Our Sea Point Residents’ Association (SOSRA), against SBG Real Estate and the Sky Trust.

The association also challenged the City’s approval of the building plans.
The legal dispute centres on interpreting a Municipal Planning By-law regarding rear boundary building lines.
Representing the residents, Advocate Cei Fehr argued that the structure violated the 4.5-meter setback requirement, while the developers relied on a specific interpretation allowing for closer construction.

The court is weighing the validity of the City's approval against the significant financial prejudice claimed by the developers, who proceeded with construction despite ongoing community opposition and previous failed consolidation attempts.
Outside court, SOSRA chairman Lindsay Rogers told the Atlantic Sun that it was rather "excruciating" to have the details fleshed out in court.
“The plots are simply not big enough to accommodate a structure of this magnitude,” he said.

According to the court documents filed on behalf of the residents, the structure has a zero metre setback, rather than the 4.5 metre setback they say is required.

The association further alleged that the City had failed to enforce its own regulations, creating what they termed a “development free-for-all” on the Atlantic Seaboard.
Screen Shot 2026-09-04 at 18.24.11.jpg

 

Sea Point flats approval declared unlawful, but construction may continue​


The Western Cape High Court has found the City of Cape Town’s approval of plans for a controversial five-storey development on St Johns Road, Sea Point, unlawful.

However, acting judge Ashley Kantor declined to set aside the approvals under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, allowing construction to continue.

Judge Kantor ruled in favour of the residents on the legal interpretation, clarifying that the 0.0metre exception applied strictly to common boundaries that physically intersect a street boundary.
Because the rear boundary does not intersect St Johns Road, the 4.5-metre setback applies, making the approved plans non-compliant.
 
Ouch!? Applying for an interdict after construction has begun, is not a winning strategy:
Rogers said: "We are acutely disappointed with this outcome. Yet another, merely pyrrhic victory, as 'winning' the case has brought with it zero relief".

P.S. We have several new 5-storey developments in Kenilworth. A 4.5m setback makes them legal, but some are still f-ugly and out of character for the area.
 
The Western Cape High Court has found the City of Cape Town’s approval of plans for a controversial five-storey development on St Johns Road, Sea Point, unlawful.

However, acting judge Ashley Kantor declined to set aside the approvals under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, allowing construction to continue.

i'm wondering how this would apply to the rest of us, should we do something unlawful
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X