All the details about DStv’s new packages

Logos are being changed again. This should satisfy most in both camps I think, that's if they stick to it - some SS channels are back on the original logos 🤷‍♂️


1789836311807.png



Also, I see 207 SS Kickoff is back to doing soccer 24/7.

Anyway, I'm done looking at this stuff.
 
M-Net group related logos changing as well, now white and some stuff noticed as smaller, lol
(Still seriously too big on MMovies Legends - horrible.)
 
Logos are being changed again. This should satisfy most in both camps I think, that's if they stick to it - some SS channels are back on the original logos 🤷‍♂️


View attachment 1938833



Also, I see 207 SS Kickoff is back to doing soccer 24/7.

Anyway, I'm done looking at this stuff.
Was watching the motogp earlier. Supersport is basically mirroring their logo it seems. Grey'ish. The old prominent red was intrusive in a way
 
It's the other way around, streaming-only is cheaper than satellite. Was done years ago as an incentive, now that idea is legacy.
Anyway it's changing back soon, if they stick to that.
He said decoder is more expensive than streaming. You say streaming is cheaper than satellite.
 
Ja/nee, looks like he's talking about satellite subs prices and calling that "decoder". Whatever though,
Yes, everybody calls satellite subs “decoder”, even the article.

So why is it more? As cavedog says, satellites are fixed costs.
 
M-Net group related logos changing as well, now white and some stuff noticed as smaller, lol
(Still seriously too big on MMovies Legends - horrible.)
Yup, and I see the mnet and kyknet logos are now back to their original blue etc colours. For now....

Looks like they listened :p
 
Yes, everybody calls satellite subs “decoder”, even the article.

Lol. Not really in the industry, but I just thought that confused you.

So why is it more? As cavedog says, satellites are fixed costs.

Sat subs costs aren't what was adjusted to make the difference then, so don't know why it's confusing.
Streaming-only was subsidised, to encourage the streaming market no doubt and then that left that way.
 
Last edited:
Yup, and I see the mnet and kyknet logos are now back to their original blue etc colours. For now....

Looks like they listened :p

:laugh: Guess they're very nervous about the market reactions. Good.
 
Lol. Not really in the industry, but I just thought that confused you.



Sat subs costs aren't what was adjusted to make the difference then, so don't know why it's confusing.
Streaming-only was subsidised, to encourage the streaming market no doubt and then that left that way.
You would think they would try encourage the decoder/satellite market too. Its their bread and butter after all.
 
Yup, and I see the mnet and kyknet logos are now back to their original blue etc colours. For now....

Looks like they listened :p
Dumbest decision ever to mess with logos. They have better fish to fry like offering premium decoder/satellite for R699 all in (access/pvr/xtraview) fee, no 24 month contract required.
 
Dumbest decision ever to mess with logos. They have better fish to fry like offering premium decoder/satellite for R699 all in (access/pvr/xtraview) fee, no 24 month contract required.

Lol, missing your other sports? :X3:

A fixed 24 months wouldn't be too bad to get that, I'm confident that's coming too. At least they've already buckled a bit about the PVR access cost.
 
Here's an interesting stat not discussed before (doesn't look like slop) , could explain the French thinking.


1789883262750.png
 

Really has become about when, no longer about if.

Firstly they've opened the door a crack, can't close it again.
And Canal+ are clearly mostly focused on the Black market in Africa, look how many soccer / footie channels there are today. Now that local market has become rugby lovers...

Interest is spreading beyond our borders too, but it's all in the south for now

1789888944638.png
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X