But there are monuments built on other “numbers”. I say numbers in inverted commas because they are arbitrary numbers. Why is the distance between lines of latitude significant relative to the speed of light? That distance is roughly 110 to 111 im between degrees.
Because it looks like, in some cases, those numbers were selected by those who had an understanding which we are not supposed to even
contemplate them having.
This is just one example. To me, a stark indicator the architects had a far more sophisticated grasp of measurement of the physical earth, both the planet itself and its relationship to other celestial bodies and constellations.
Perhaps if there are no more than one or two remarkable coincidences, one can say well the jury is still out on these claims. But as they begin to stack up, only the bone-headed, dog-like obedient will tell you 2 + 2 = 3.
There are monuments built all over the world on other lines of latitude (and longitude). What makes having something at that particular number, specifically north of the equator, significant in your eyes?
The co-existence of other markers.
Alignment with constellations, for example, which indicate the age of construction, which can be confirmed through other ancient monuments.
It's an exercise in dot-joining and pattern recognition.
I understand not everyone is up for that, though..
Science is about an attempt to figure things out. It’s full of things that change when new information becomes available. Being dogmatic about things is ignorant. People are ignorant in general, from the most intelligent to the least.
People are especially dogmatic when there is a perverse incentive to keep new information from coming to light.
If you can see that when a new piece of information comes to light, which an expert thinks will destroy his career, he may reach for what means he has at his disposal to prevent it from coming to light, it should not be difficult to anticipate there will be attempts to conceal or distract from the new information which have ramifications far beyond just upheaval for a single expert ..... i.e. all of humanity loses out, due to that attempt to conceal and distract.
The problem is not 'people's tendency to be dogmatic, but the incentives which come into play when you relinquish responsibility, for vetting experts, to the State.
That is why humanity suffered so much during the union between Church and State.
At some point that union was broken and that was a very good thing, but certain individuals who cannot imagine themselves surviving, let alone thriving, on a level playing field where everyone is equal before the law immediately started working to prevent such a leveling of the playing field.
They did this by portraying man's nature as evil and depraved.... a doctrine which lends itself to justifications for a central authority consisting of a two-tier system. The same anti-human doctrine that characterized the Church-State union, persists in modern forms. It began with the co-opting of Darwin's theories(to become 'Social Darwinism') and became the basis for what is taught/inferred in public curricula and State propaganda.
Same old doctrine, in new packaging.
What is the perverse incentive to suppress the pyramid story as pure coincidence?
The incentive to distract and suppress new information or even mere exploration, by lesser mortals, is career security.... coercive(legal) protection from the free market in ideas and information.
A lot of people say it is material i.e. down to money, but I diverge from that theory. I think it is down to control, and that money is merely a
means to that, more encompassing, end.
The impulse to prevent a level playing field, whilst portraying it as an act of humanity and compassion, is as old as humanity itself, and much, much older.
We
all suffer, ultimately, due the space and platform given to that short-sighted view tho'.