wingnut771
Honorary Master
Why would he want to land?My point is, From the attackers point of view, why would he start in mid air... Rather start the "altercation" 1 min away from landing.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Why would he want to land?My point is, From the attackers point of view, why would he start in mid air... Rather start the "altercation" 1 min away from landing.
Hitting the ground at 1100km/h would be worse.Much easier to crash during the landing, and cause much more damage and havoc
Much easier to crash during the landing, and cause much more damage and havoc
Already discussed previously in this thread. People are cherry picking old tweets when this was a breaking story a day later to bash legacy media. All you need to look at the original post in this thread versus what we know now.
This is the result of a 170ft dive in 4.6 seconds on an Air Singapore flight 2 years agoBreaking: Pilot ATTACKS Captain, 737 Dives 14,000 Feet | What Happened? - Garybpilot


This is the result of a 170ft dive in 4.6 seconds on an Air Singapore flight 2 years ago
View attachment 1941943
But the 14000ft dive in 29 seconds didn't even disturb the passengers' drinks!?They would have to have entered the dive so gently as to maintain near positive 1G and pulled out of it the same, but then how did it cause enough stress to rip of the vertical stabilizer control surface?
View attachment 1941944
The damages looks more like severe turbulence which is a whole other kettle of fish since it is not the drop but the stop that does the damage. It is also one of the big reasons it is not likely that a civilian recovered the dive since doing it wrong near mach 1 can cause structural failure.This is the result of a 170ft dive in 4.6 seconds on an Air Singapore flight 2 years ago
View attachment 1941943
But the 14000ft dive in 29 seconds didn't even disturb the passengers' drinks!?They would have to have entered the dive so gently as to maintain near positive 1G and pulled out of it the same, but then how did it cause enough stress to rip of the vertical stabilizer control surface?
View attachment 1941944
Exactly! They would have needed to know to first throttle back completely to slow the rate of descent and get the air speed under control before pulling back to level out. Some reports even said the plane was in a spin, which would mean he would of needed to know to first throttle back, centralize the control column and apply full opposite rudder to exit the spin, then pull back gently to level out and get the air speed under control before throttling back up.It is also one of the big reasons it is not likely that a civilian recovered the dive since doing it wrong near mach 1 can cause structural failure.
Exactly! They would have needed to know to first throttle back completely to slow the rate of descent and get the air speed under control before pulling back to level out. Some reports even said the plane was in a spin, which would mean he would of needed to know to first throttle back, centralize the control column and apply full opposite rudder to exit the spin, then pull back gently to level out and get the air speed under control before throttling back up.
This is all fishy as hell.
Not fishy at all. The plumber was trained at the same flight school as the 9/11 guys considering that the same people were behind both…incidents.
Yaniv Hayoun put the attacker in a chokehold and pulled him off the yoke. Using techniques he remembered from watching the TV show Mayday, he pulled back on the controls to steady the plane before other crew members took over.
some of these so called experts need to slip on a few bananas maybe get their heads on straight.True to MyBB form, the expits are comparing apples and oranges with the result being bananas.
100% This is all a conspiracy to make muslims & Islam look bad. No wonder Indians & Israelis were involved in this charade - partners in crime.This is the result of a 170ft dive in 4.6 seconds on an Air Singapore flight 2 years ago
View attachment 1941943
But the 14000ft dive in 29 seconds didn't even disturb the passengers' drinks!?They would have to have entered the dive so gently as to maintain near positive 1G and pulled out of it the same, but then how did it cause enough stress to rip of the vertical stabilizer control surface?
View attachment 1941944
No need for conspiracies.100% This is all a conspiracy to make muslims & Islam look bad. No wonder Indians & Israelis were involved in this charade - partners in crime.
Spot on. This helps Modi in India too. There was South african & British involved so it probably helps Cyril & Andy respectively.So has Netanyahu secured the election? Or was it already secured before this incident?
Spot on. This helps Modi in India too. There was South african & British involved so it probably helps Cyril & Andy respectively.
Pity Oman's monarch gets no benefit out of this though. I wonder if we should raise back-a-buddy for him.
Exactly! They would have needed to know to first throttle back completely to slow the rate of descent and get the air speed under control before pulling back to level out. Some reports even said the plane was in a spin, which would mean he would of needed to know to first throttle back, centralize the control column and apply full opposite rudder to exit the spin, then pull back gently to level out and get the air speed under control before throttling back up.
This is all fishy as hell.