Protests in South Africa turn violent with cars torched and gunshots fired

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reuters
  • Start date Start date
First off, that's not in Umbilo. That's in Berea.

Secondly...do you okes even live here in Durban ? That area is a known shithole with prozzies and drug houses.

BunnyBoy lives out in the nice laanie areas, but you Ghost, aren't you right here in Glenwood?


I didn't actually read the post, lmao; I just wanted to post the video. I was down the road helping the folks out at the bottom of Clark Road at the time.
 
First off, that's not in Umbilo. That's in Berea.

Secondly...do you okes even live here in Durban ? That area is a known shithole with prozzies and drug houses.

BunnyBoy lives out in the nice laanie areas, but you Ghost, aren't you right here in Glenwood?


Crimetown is a laanie area? Fsck me, learn something new everyday.

I grew up in the Glenwood area and I know that its a shytehole with prozzies and drug houses, has been for ages. Still doesn't change the fact that this shyte is all on the police for not doing their damn jobs (at stopping the prozzies and drug house, as well as not stopping these riotous twats)
 
MEDIA STATEMENT
Issued by Cllr Fran Kristopher – Ward 33 Councillor, eThekwini Municipality
11 October 2026
ZERO TOLERANCE FOR DISORDER IN DAVENPORT — RESIDENTS CANNOT CONTINUE TO PAY THE PRICE!
The time for excuses is over. Davenport needs decisive action, strict enforcement and accountability.
The scenes witnessed in the Davenport Precinct last night are unacceptable and demand an urgent, uncompromising response from every authority responsible for public safety and law enforcement.
According to information available, the situation escalated to such an extent that more than 150 SAPS members, Metro Police and over 40 South African National Defence Force (SANDF) members, supported by four Army vehicles, were deployed in response to the disorder and to assist in dispersing street bashers.
Let that sink in.
When a precinct requires a deployment of this magnitude to restore order, serious questions must be asked about the effectiveness of existing enforcement measures, the management of large gatherings and the protection of residents who are forced to live with the consequences.
Davenport cannot become a lawless entertainment zone where disorder is tolerated, residents are intimidated by noise and disturbances, and enforcement only becomes visible when a situation spirals out of control.
ZERO TOLERANCE — WITHOUT FEAR OR FAVOUR
It is understood that Metro Police and SAPS had earlier coordinated a roadblock operation aimed at preventing drinking and driving. These preventative measures are necessary and must be supported.
However, despite those efforts, large numbers of people were subsequently observed gathering in the streets, with students appearing to make up a significant proportion of the crowd. Alcohol was being consumed from vehicle boots and cooler boxes.
This raises serious questions about the enforcement of applicable liquor regulations, municipal by-laws, public-order requirements and traffic laws.
Let me be clear: this is not about targeting students. It is about holding everyone accountable for their conduct, regardless of age, status or affiliation. Anyone who breaks the law must face the appropriate consequences.
Responsible entertainment is one thing. Conduct that undermines public safety, disrupts neighbourhoods and disregards the rights of others is entirely another.
Residents have repeatedly raised concerns about excessive noise, public drinking, disorderly behaviour, congestion, illegal parking and the impact of activities in the Davenport and surrounding precincts. These concerns cannot continue to be met with temporary interventions and promises that fail to deliver lasting change.
RESIDENTS ARE NOT SECOND-CLASS CITIZENS
The people who live in Davenport and the surrounding areas have a right to peace, safety and security in their own homes.
They should not have to tolerate excessive noise late into the night, struggle with traffic congestion, fear damage to their property or repeatedly contact law enforcement without receiving an effective response.
Local businesses that operate responsibly must also be protected from disorder that threatens their customers, staff and operations.
The rights of those seeking entertainment do not supersede the rights of residents to safety, peace and dignity.
The fact that such a substantial deployment was reportedly necessary should serve as a wake-up call. We cannot continue operating on a crisis-to-crisis basis while the underlying problems remain unresolved.
MY DEMANDS TO THE RELEVANT AUTHORITIES
As Ward 33 Councillor, I am calling for the immediate implementation of a ZERO-TOLERANCE ENFORCEMENT PLAN for the Davenport Precinct.
I demand:
1. A sustained SAPS and Metro Police presence during identified high-risk periods, particularly evenings, weekends and large street gatherings.
2. Strict enforcement of applicable laws and municipal by-laws relating to public drinking, noise disturbances, unlawful liquor sales, disorderly conduct, illegal parking and traffic violations.
3. Firm action against drinking and driving, with preventative roadblocks and enforcement operations maintained and strengthened where necessary.
4. A comprehensive investigation and official report on last night's events, including the circumstances that necessitated the reported SAPS and SANDF deployment and the measures taken to restore order.
5. Accountability from the relevant municipal departments and enforcement agencies regarding complaints previously lodged by residents and the effectiveness of responses to those complaints.
6. A coordinated operational plan involving SAPS, Metro Police, municipal enforcement, licensing authorities and other relevant stakeholders, with clear responsibilities and measurable outcomes.
7. Regular engagement with affected residents and businesses so that their concerns inform enforcement operations and progress can be monitored.
Zero tolerance must mean consistent, lawful and impartial enforcement — not simply a show of force after a situation has escalated.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
I will not accept a situation in which residents are expected to endure recurring disturbances while responsibility is passed between departments and agencies.
The Davenport Precinct must be managed responsibly. Businesses must comply with the conditions of their licences and applicable laws. Those attending gatherings must respect the law and the community. Enforcement agencies must act decisively, consistently and impartially.
There must be consequences for unlawful conduct. There must be accountability for enforcement failures. And there must be measurable improvements in public safety.
I am calling on the relevant authorities to urgently engage with affected stakeholders and demonstrate, through action rather than words, that the concerns of Davenport residents are being taken seriously.
We cannot allow this situation to become the accepted norm.
MY MESSAGE IS SIMPLE: ZERO TOLERANCE FOR LAWLESSNESS. ZERO TOLERANCE FOR REPEATED DISTURBANCES. ZERO TOLERANCE FOR FAILING TO PROTECT OUR RESIDENTS.
Davenport deserves order, accountability and a safe environment for everyone who lives, works and visits the precinct.
Enough is enough. The time for decisive action is NOW.

Cllr Fran Kristopher
Ward 33 Councillor
eThekwini Municipality
Ward 33: Umbilo – Glenwood – Bulwer
 
I saw a few videos over the weekend of this "protest". In several of them rioters were carrying weapons (Clubs, sticks) and actively attacking groups of police officers. The police were able to disarm them without taking any real hits.

So I started wondering why? Why do the police accept this without emptying a magazine into one of them?

Obviously you don't want to kill someone if you could have resolved it reasonably peacefully - like they did - but from what I can see in most of the videos they didn't even arrest the guy? I'm sure if I took an axe handle and started swinging it at the head of the closest cop I would end up in the back of a van pretty quickly.

I Think we have reached a point where the police are so outnumbered and so scared of the rioters that they are basically just trying to survive the riot and go home. Arresting a key rioter will likely lead to escalation and force them to expend greater force, thereby inciting the crowd even more.

We have a serious problem if this is the level of police enforcement we can muster. This is the reason that even "legitimate" protests are hijacked by thugs who just want to burn and loot. They know the police are powerless and the broken justice system means that even if you do get arrested you will likely never really stand trial and go to prison.

Someday soon this is going to spill over into a "good" neighbourhood where citizens actually have something worth defending and the means to do so and it's going to get real ugly.
 
I saw a few videos over the weekend of this "protest". In several of them rioters were carrying weapons (Clubs, sticks) and actively attacking groups of police officers. The police were able to disarm them without taking any real hits.

So I started wondering why? Why do the police accept this without emptying a magazine into one of them?

Obviously you don't want to kill someone if you could have resolved it reasonably peacefully - like they did - but from what I can see in most of the videos they didn't even arrest the guy? I'm sure if I took an axe handle and started swinging it at the head of the closest cop I would end up in the back of a van pretty quickly.

I Think we have reached a point where the police are so outnumbered and so scared of the rioters that they are basically just trying to survive the riot and go home. Arresting a key rioter will likely lead to escalation and force them to expend greater force, thereby inciting the crowd even more.

We have a serious problem if this is the level of police enforcement we can muster. This is the reason that even "legitimate" protests are hijacked by thugs who just want to burn and loot. They know the police are powerless and the broken justice system means that even if you do get arrested you will likely never really stand trial and go to prison.

Someday soon this is going to spill over into a "good" neighbourhood where citizens actually have something worth defending and the means to do so and it's going to get real ugly.
Too many laws since marikana, cop would probably get arrested.
 
Remember when you laughed and said June 30 was over and fokoli would happen after :whistling:

Well fokoli has really happened, its just the same bollocks really, and the evil dirty forriners just move around while the popo do nuffink.
 
Tut tut tut Shawny... pissing my pants and annoyance are different things.

I'm passingly British, when I get irate then I'm pissing my pants :P
As long as it's your pants and not our substation, like what I witnessed at about 6 am this morning.
 
I 100% agree with you.

This should never have been allowed to get to this point, but somehow the police must "balance" peoples rights and somehow that balance ends up with people being allowed to loot and destroy shyte cos like "Right to protest"
After Marikana, the police are extremely lenient on "protestors"

PS: Marikana was a sh*tshow and those people didn't deserve to be killed in panic but also, don't arm yourself with pangas and burn down things in protest of something whilst not expecting some form of pushback...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X