Netanyahu says Israel will control ‘all of Gaza’ after latest offensive

vigras rojara said:
No problem. And I'm absolutely sure that of that crisis ever happened, you'd stick to your principles. 😉
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you mean. I'm trying to draw a parallel between SA and Israel/Gaza but coming up short.

If it's a land thing, we sorted all that out I'm the 90's already. Malema is just a kak stirrer who doesn't know his own country.
 
Solarion said:
I have no idea what you mean. I'm trying to draw a parallel between SA and Israel/Gaza but coming up short.
Click to expand...

It's not difficult, mate.

If you want to use the "who was there first" theory, then it should apply elsewhere too.

My point is that if a similar claim was made about property in SA, you might decide that in SA's case the above methodology was totally invalid.
 
vigras rojara said:
Sure, but look at what you said in #2211. If old Julius said that sort of thing about Africa, there'd be reeeing for months.
Click to expand...

He has done and we have done.

vigras rojara said:
A little bit of introspection never hurt anyone.
Click to expand...

vigras rojara said:
It's not difficult, mate.

If you want to use the "who was there first" theory, then it should apply elsewhere too.

My point is that if a similar claim was made about property in SA, you might decide that in SA's case the above methodology was totally invalid.
Click to expand...

I think you are comparing apples and oranges. My point is that Israel is a country established through warfare, like many others, not colonialism several hundred years ago. I'd say that Northern Cyprus or Karelia are better examples than South Africa. People displaced through war and having to start a new life elsewhere. It's a theme since forever. The difference is the Arabs lost the war and won't accept it and here we are.

But sure, Malema can say what he wants, doesn't mean it means anything or we should listen. If he tries it, good luck to him, I for one have a safe full of ammo.
 
vigras rojara said:
It's not difficult, mate.

If you want to use the "who was there first" theory, then it should apply elsewhere too.

My point is that if a similar claim was made about property in SA, you might decide that in SA's case the above methodology was totally invalid.
Click to expand...

Well,many claims about property are made still. The original one was finalized in 1998, then reopened and as claims come in they get sorted out. In SA we don't start bombing each other and what not. We just deal with it.

Ignore Malema. He just loves making a noise to get attention. The issues over farmland are also getting sorted out and land is currently being distributed to back farmers.
 
Solarion said:
Well,many claims about property are made still. The original one was finalized in 1998, then reopened and as claims come in they get sorted out. In SA we don't start bombing each other and what not. We just deal with it.

Ignore Malema. He just loves making a noise to get attention. The issues over farmland are also getting sorted out and land is currently being distributed to back farmers.
Click to expand...


Agreed, Saffers tend to be a bit more civilised.
 
Malema is the one who loses his **** and has packed stadiums going full retard. He's on his own faulty mission.
 
Spizz said:
He has done and we have done.





I think you are comparing apples and oranges. My point is that Israel is a country established through warfare, like many others, not colonialism several hundred years ago. I'd say that Northern Cyprus or Karelia are better examples than South Africa. People displaced through war and having to start a new life elsewhere. It's a theme since forever. The difference is the Arabs lost the war and won't accept it and here we are.

But sure, Malema can say what he wants, doesn't mean it means anything or we should listen. If he tries it, good luck to him, I for one have a safe full of ammo.
Click to expand...

Ok that's fine, it's just the Biblical prophesies about who owns what that are a con of note. You clearly understand how conflict arises over land issues too, which is good.
 
Spizz said:
As I said before, if he only posted on crimes commited by black people and ignored everything else going on, what would you call him? So yeah, some things are indeed staring us right in the face. He just hates Jews, simple as that.
Click to expand...
Good to have you back after your song and dance about leaving this thread :love: We missed your Hasbara.
 
Wut said:
Good to have you back after your song and dance about leaving this thread :love: We missed your Hasbara.
Click to expand...

Are you going to keep trying to convert us to Hamas supporters or are you ready to actually be serious for once?

1000011279.gif
 
OutlawJoseyWales said:
So basically when evidence arises that contradicts your narrative, you put your fingers in your ears and say lalalala. Got it.
Click to expand...

Seeing as I never read it, I’ve no idea what you are talking about.

But please understand, although I have no doubt Israel do and have done some bad things, I am not interested in selective outrage and propaganda from bad faith actors with an agenda.

Now about your “lies and outdated” comment? Anything to add or are you just doubling down on you swallowing the anti-Israel propaganda?
 
Spizz said:
Seeing as I never read it, I’ve no idea what you are talking about.

But please understand, although I have no doubt Israel do and have done some bad things, I am not interested in selective outrage and propaganda from bad faith actors with an agenda.

Now about your “lies and outdated” comment? Anything to add or are you just doubling down on you swallowing the anti-Israel propaganda?
Click to expand...

Like I have said countless times, I used to be on your side of the debate, but that slowly changed to where I am now.

I don't support Hamas or any terrorist group either, not even close.

Istael's own actions is seeing the world view them very differently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X