Courier Guy founder responds to luxury estate hostile takeover allegations

A small bit of constructive criticism for the writers.
When I've just read 300 words and I know everything except what the article heading is actually about I stop reading out of annoyance. The little details about his beginning etc. is cool, but maybe leave those to the 2nd part of the article to flesh out the narrative.
 
What they have forgotten about is that special resolutions and planning is not done based on the number of votes in an estate in total, but rather by number of votes at the meeting provided the meeting was quorate.

So he could come there with his 60 houses and control the vote, as generally every estate meeting I've attended is generally very poorly attended.

Lesson, make sure your meetings are well attended by your owners.
 
WoodWhisperer said:
Later today...

Big trouble for luxury estates​

Click to expand...

Surprised they even named TCG in the headline rather than going with a more vague yet descriptive like

Founder of Large South African Courier Company Who Previously Licensed Pudo Logistics Brand Responds To Luxury Estate Hostile Takeover Allegations

Still waiting on that MyBB journo job offer, I'm sure its in the mail.
 
"How much do you need to earn to stay at the luxury Eagle Canyon Golf Estate?"
 
How Voting Works Under the STSMA:
  • Voting in Value (Participation Quota / PQ): As laid out in Section 6(6) of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 (STSMA), the default and primary method for calculating votes in a body corporate is in value. Each member's vote is calculated based on the total participation quota (PQ) of the sections they own (which corresponds to the size of their unit).
  • Voting in Number: Under Section 6(7) of the STSMA, when votes are counted in number, each member has one vote—regardless of how many units they own or the size of their sections. [1, 2]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X