Press release: CIAG 2026 LGE Voting Guide

When voting; does the party/candidate represent your principles, or is it just the least bad option?

  • It's my least bad option

    Votes: 15 65.2%

  • It's enough of a representation of my morals

    Votes: 4 17.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 2 8.7%

  • I don't see any 'lesser evil' element to voting options, so I'm not concerned about that

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • "None of the Above" if it existed - register my rejection of the 'lesser-evil' election status-quo

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • The party/candidate I vote for accurately represents my views

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • Total voters
    23
so i started shopping around for a party to give my vote to.
started off with ff+.
mail sent 14 october - no response or even acknowledgement of receipt.
not a good start !


Screen Shot 2026-10-25 at 10.50.18.jpg



next up cip - identical mail (content) will be sent
will send to local candidate

so mulder may be busy, but someone from his office could have responded in some way.
i guess for better or worse - the da is the benchmark. over time:
mail to steenhuisen - directly responded.
mail to zille - directly responded.
mail to hill-lewis - no response (automated - then nothing)
mail to winde - directly responded
 
@Grant

Not sure if you watched the Jerm interview with Jack Miller.

But it reminded me of a good reason why you don't see many CIP posters up in Sea Point.

Any guesses as to what I'm referring to?
 
Grant said:
no - never watched

never watched, no idea
Click to expand...
Jack is a very outspoken person.

Not your typical politician that tells voters what they want to hear.

In the interview, for example, he mentioned the fact that CIP was the only political party to stand up vocally against the lockdowns from the start (ACDP only took a stand about a year into LDs).

I'm going to hazard a guess and say both Jerm and Jack are critical of what you might call the parasite class and chief among them would be Zionists. Sea Point is quite pro-Israeli, iirc, and although being pro-Israeli doesn't necessarily indicate pro-Netanyahu, perhaps Jack foresees that support in Sea point, except for a very small number, is just not going to happen.

He said to me, personally, once, that the biggest opposition to Cape secession comes not from the RET people, but from the wealthiest people. He would know, too, being from Constantia.

Maybe I'm reading too much into it... but it just crossed my mind after listening to that interview.
 
lexity said:
Jack is a very outspoken person.

Not your typical politician that tells voters what they want to hear.

In the interview, for example, he mentioned the fact that CIP was the only political party to stand up vocally against the lockdowns from the start (ACDP only took a stand about a year into LDs).

I'm going to hazard a guess and say both Jerm and Jack are critical of what you might call the parasite class and chief among them would be Zionists. Sea Point is quite pro-Israeli, iirc, and although being pro-Israeli doesn't necessarily indicate pro-Netanyahu, perhaps Jack foresees that support in Sea point, except for a very small number, is just not going to happen.

He said to me, personally, once that the biggest opposition to Cape secession comes not from the RET people, but from the wealthiest people. He would know, too, being from Constantia.

Maybe I'm reading too much into it... but it just crossed my mind after listening to that interview.
Click to expand...

I wonder why the wealthiest people might be against these incompetents thinking they can run anything.
 
ToxicBunny said:
I wonder why the wealthiest people might be against these incompetents thinking they can run anything.
Click to expand...
Perhaps because property rights is not their top priority, but rather a middle-class that is bogged down by regulations/red-tape, because of a dangerously criminal society that necessitates industry regulation and the taxation that goes with it.

Secession would be a great leveler. Naturally it imbues the politically connected with fear of losing that economic advantage.
 
lexity said:
Perhaps because property rights is not their top priority, but rather a middle-class that is bogged down by regulations/red-tape, because of a dangerously criminal society that necessitates industry regulation and the taxation that goes with it.

Secession would be a great leveler. Naturally it imbues the politically connected with fear of losing that economic advantage.
Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha *changes peed in pants* hahahahahahahaha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X