Press release: CIAG 2026 LGE Voting Guide

[lexity]

Loading..... [whY sHoUld I wAtch a 1hR interview... why aRe therE No tiMestAmps!!!]

 

[ToxicBunny]

Loading..... [whY sHoUld I wAtch a 1hR interview... why aRe therE No tiMestAmps!!!]

Well you still haven't put down anything useful as to why someone should watch an hour of Jack waffling like a politician.

Hell I wouldn't even watch an hour of a passably competent politician waffle, so why would I watch Jack do that when he has actually achieved fsck all of any substance.

 

[vigras rojara]

Loading..... [whY sHoUld I wAtch a 1hR interview... why aRe therE No tiMestAmps!!!]

It's an hour and a half, and there is still no evidence of any "achievements" being referred to during the interview.

It's actually quite cringe worthy at this point, and once more blatantly obvious why CI never gains momentum.

 

[lexity]

It's an hour and a half, and there is still no evidence of any "achievements" being referred to during the interview.

It's actually quite cringe worthy at this point, and once more blatantly obvious why CI never gains momentum.

Perhaps Brian_G is correct in what he was alluding to the other day....

... perhaps being genuinely interested or objective about someone's viewpoint would have your paid contract cancelled.

Applies to both of you.

 

[vigras rojara]

Perhaps Brian_G is correct in what he was alluding to the other day....

... perhaps being genuinely interested or objective about someone's viewpoint would have your paid contract cancelled.

Applies to both of you.

Waffle on.

I guess Jack's glorious achievements will remain hidden forever. What a shame.

 

[ToxicBunny]

Perhaps Brian_G is correct in what he was alluding to the other day....

... perhaps being genuinely interested or objective about someone's viewpoint would have your paid contract cancelled.

Applies to both of you.

I can be objective about someones viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I need to listen to an hour of them waffling about how they've achieved nothing.

They must pony up data, not waffles.

 

[quovadis]

What was it last time? 20?

They've figured out they can run in multiple wards and just inconvenience every voter if they win more than one. Seems very much like coercive Invalidation of voluntary choice, have you lodged your objection with them for doing this?

 

[Grant]

slowly but surely - working my way
plenty "redacted", quite a bit of personal contact details in there:



View attachment 1948948

progress going well.
response from ward candidate:

 

[Grant]

so, at this point my vote will land up with cip.
candidate's views (with regard to my ward) align 100% with mine

 

[Brian_G]

That's why I don't do this level of politics.

It's all downstream of the Welfare State.

The 68 percenters are at least on the right side of history, and on the moral compass that says all govt spending/redistribution is based on theft.

Says who?
For instance, my bet is 59% of them just couldn't be bothered anymore, little to no further thought at all let alone any moral compass

Guessing ≠ fact. Of all people here I thought you knew that best :-/

Perhaps not the greatest platform to be promoted on if you are trying to establish credibility though.

if you think your supporters are mostly conspiracy nuts, it makes perfect sense. If the tinfoil hat fits...

Why would they want to establish credibility? Anything more than 2 extra seats could end up being given away it seems

 

[lexity]

That's why I don't do this level of politics.

It's all downstream of the Welfare State.

The 68 percenters are at least on the right side of history, and on the moral compass that says all govt spending/redistribution is based on theft.

Says who?
For instance, my bet is 59% of them just couldn't be bothered anymore, little to no further thought at all let alone any moral compass

Guessing ≠ fact. Of all people here I thought you knew that best :-/

I didn't say they are on the moral compass by virtue of their considerations on these matters.

Regardless of why they are there (and we can know the reason by having a NOTA option added) they are on the right side of history and have opted out of an immoral act.

These are facts.

You can say the moral question of theft is not descriptive but prescriptive, but it is such a universal value that it is virtually a fact.

 

[Brian_G]

I didn't say they are on the moral compass by virtue of their considerations on these matters.

Regardless of why they are there (and we can know the reason by having a NOTA option added) they are on the right side of history and have opted out of an immoral act.

These are facts.

You can say the moral question of theft is not descriptive but prescriptive, but it is such a universal value that it is virtually a fact.

No, no, no... they have opted out of no such thing. You see it as immoral, they don't necessarily.

At least if you're going to start sounding like a politician, then vote




hahahaha

 

[capd]

so, at this point my vote will land up with cip.
candidate's views (with regard to my ward) align 100% with mine

Welcome aboard

 

[Brian_G]

Welcome aboard

Not so fast, sunshine ;- )

so, at this point my vote will land up with cip.
candidate's views (with regard to my ward) align 100% with mine

 

[lexity]

No, no, no... they have opted out of no such thing.

Every last one of them decides at every election that they have something better/more constructive to do.... than to go and stand in a queue to add one more voice over who should hold the gun, while that party spends other peoples' wealth, without consent, for the next 5 years.

 

[Grant]

Not so fast, sunshine ;- )

90% certainty
if you are a betting man - insider tip - go all in

 

[Brian_G]

Every last one of them decides at every election that they have something better/more constructive to do.... than to go and stand in a queue

When I didn't vote for years, it was due to believing it was a waste of time - nothing to do with doing anything constructive, I likely just took a nap or watched telly.

to add one more voice over who should hold the gun, while that party spends other peoples' wealth, without consent, for the next 5 years.

Reminder - they are voting to GIVE consent

Oi vey

 

[lexity]

Every last one of them decides at every election that they have something better/more constructive to do.... than to go and stand in a queue

When I didn't vote for years, it was due to believing it was a waste of time - nothing to do with doing anything constructive, I likely just took a nap or watched telly.

Sounds a lot like you decided taking a nap or watching telly was a better use of your time.

It certainly was the more moral option, even if you didn't realize it at the time.

 

[Brian_G]

*shrugs*

*gives up*

/leaves

 

[vigras rojara]

When I didn't vote for years, it was due to believing it was a waste of time - nothing to do with doing anything constructive, I likely just took a nap or watched telly.



Reminder - they are voting to GIVE consent

Oi vey

If you think the current crowd is useless, just remember that you still get your passport in a week or two.

Imagine what that process would be like with Lex and co. Five years later you'd still be arguing about what a passport was.