Revealed: David Walliams accused of using celebrity status to prey on young women for sex

Yeah. I climbed on my roof and yelled I secede. Nobody listened. Neighbors probably thought I was drunk.

I am now busy drafting my letter of independence and will print 5000 copies at the end of the month to distribute in my neighborhood.
Oh, so you're a supporter of secession.

I had no idea behind that wall of hostility was the will to stick to your individual principles.

Well done.
:thumbsup:
 
It's not rocket science.

A jury must be part of the morally homogenous group.

Obviously it can't work otherwise.

If your group is all over the map, morally.... it's a recipe for injustice/arbitrary rule.

👀
 
Interesting aspect in (at least)the rape case.

I can only accept a verdict from all 12 of you that is a unanimous verdict.

No judge should be saying this when it has no bearing on individual jurors' duty.

Perhaps every judge says this, every time, even when it is politically inexpedient. :unsure:
 

Speaking on The Private Eye Podcast, which was released prior to Walliams being named, journalist Justine Smith alleged that there’s another man who has obtained an injunction.

She alleges the man has ‘multiple, multiple victims’.

Speaking on the podcast, Smith said: ‘There are two men at the moment who can’t be named. One for the most recent proceedings, and then one from several months back.

‘Both of them, there are injunctions on reporting anything. Both of them multiple, multiple victims. Both of them in the public eye.’

She added: ‘I’ve spoken to one of the alleged victims in one of them, she’s prepared to speak publicly and be named, but we still can’t publish that.

‘He’s managed to get an injunction, very heavily slapped anyone who dares to say anything about it. So we know this man is out there potentially abusing other people and there’s nothing we can do to report it.’

The remarks come in the wake of Russell Brand being convicted for rape and sexual assault on Monday.

The following day, claims against Walliams were revealed.

b5oynm.jpg
 
To be fair, British humour has always been somewhat camp; absurd, theatrical, flamboyant and heavy on sexual innuendo.

Even legends like the Monty Python crew frequently performed in drag and leaned heavily into sexual innuendo and absurdism.

Reminds me a bit of Uncle Monty. Think they definitely got some “inspiration” from him. ))
Much prefer British humour though. Never once laughed at Friends, or Seinfeld.
 
Second? There must be hundreds of them

That's not even counting the politicians
Yeah one at a time. If you throw hundreds at the people nothing will happen.

They cannot focus on more than 2.
 
Oh, so you're a supporter of secession.

I had no idea behind that wall of hostility was the will to stick to your individual principles.

Well done.
:thumbsup:
I'm sorry sir this is a wendys

Oh wait its a thread about a celeb that was exposed for being a perv, not secession.
Very different things... unless you want to establish a new state where preying on kids is not a crime ??
 
I'm sorry sir this is a wendys

Oh wait its a thread about a celeb that was exposed for being a perv
... which is a juridical matter.

, not secession.
Very different things...
Same same.

You'll have to read back a bit to get the context

Look up 'willing to share a jurisdiction with morons, who cannot learn from their mistakes.... the average fellow citizen'.

Words to that effect.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X