Funny - every fourth packet times out:
Pinging www.sentech.co.za [66.18.65.115] with 32 bytes of d
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=617ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=360ms TTL=250
Request timed out.
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=379ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=416ms TTL=250
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=393ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=250
Request timed out.
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=250
Reply from 66.18.65.115: bytes=32 time=388ms TTL=250
Ping statistics for 66.18.65.115:
Packets: Sent = 17, Received = 12, Lost = 5 (29% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 154ms, Maximum = 617ms, Average = 355ms
This does not look good at all. I am gonna keep my mouth shut from now on...the moment you mention something good, it changes [}

]
-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
"We find comfort among those who agree with us - growth among those who don't."
Frank A. Clark