Paradox of Zero.

Similar to being on LSD for a month.

I’m just bipolar and on mood stabilisers.

Manic episodes are epic, and I suspect he’s been on one for almost a decade.

Everything has gradients.
Sorry to hear, I hope you find a solution or a treatment that could help you.

Like @Brian_G mentioned if by any chance he has been trolling, then that's next level trolling.

However he claims it is aliens that communicate with him and gives him this knowledge.

Below are some of his responses in various threads.

So anyone can decide;
is he an expert level troll?

Is he having some sort of psychosis episode?

Or is he perhaps really communicating with extraterrestrials ?




I have got contact with Aliens. They say all physical processes should have definite in-between states. They take it as an Axiom.

Telepathy works by showing the mental states of the other one directly: it does not go through my eyes, neither is it distorted by my mind.

I'm not doing drugs. My week is filled with computer work.

The Aliens give me Physics knowledge: all well worked out from axioms.

I don't have to trust them, I can see if the axioms are plausible and the reasoning can be examined as sound or not. There is not anything else I need to trust them with. My subconscious can't make up anything I don't already know about.

They can't be considered trustworthy, but a Telepath can read their minds to see if they are sincere in a particular case.

I consider the abductions are necessary, since they want to make me embassador to Earth.

I know they exist. They taught me their physics: it's all derived from axioms: nothing I could have made up.

A real world application could be to generate energy.

No I can't externalize enough of it. But I can converse telepathically about it. Just the axiom: every physical process must have definite intermediate states.

Don't be stupid, you can get your medication for free at a government institution.

I don't have disorganized thought and I hallucinate reality. I don't hallucinate things that aren't there. I don't have inability to experience interest or pleasure. I don't have agitation or slowing of motion, or maintaining of unusual postures. I don't have delusions. I don't have fixed beliefs against experience. I don't have experience of influences or feelings that I am not myself.

The aliens are real. When they abduct me I feel like I sit in the ceiling for a while, but they return me to the next instant of time after the abduction started - so they send me back in time. They abduct me even in front of other humans.

They haven't got individuality, they are a collective consciousness. They have numbers, not names.

They don't use Arabic numerals and they use base 8: that is what the numbers translate to in my mind.

They don't use Arabic numerals, they actually use quite complex pictures. It translates to Arabic numerals in my mind.

They got 8 fingers.

It's like you would give numbers to your fingers.

I see their symbols in my minds eye. I see them externally when they abduct me, but it is sort of internal since they put me back in time when they return me from abduction.

The symbol was in white or green.

Won't do DMT. I heard it causes hallucinations of bugs on your body.
 
So anyone can decide;
is he an expert level troll?

Is he having some sort of psychosis episode?

Or is he perhaps really communicating with extraterrestrials ?

Health is most certain, as mentioned before his science efforts are too involved for him to be a shallow thinker or trying to just be a joker.

Aliens mentions don't make sense; in his case the knowledge he claims they help with has been proven sub-standard nearly every time, not any breakthroughs.


He doesn't mind the laughing at him, not sure he gets most of our jokes. So all seems harmless enough, but he's not our circus animal.
 
He doesn't mind the laughing at him, not sure he gets most of our jokes. So all seems harmless enough, but he's not our circus animal.

No of course not, that's why I'm not blasting him for creating these threads, or being a d00s to him on the replies he's given.
I've made some light hearted jokes towards the comments he's made, but for most part I just let him be, as the topic of he's threads don't interest me at all, and I have no knowledge of what he's referring to.

If it is some sort of a psychotic episode, I hope he has a family member, friend, colleague etc.. that will notice it and reach out to him etc.
 
I've been a d00s to him sometimes, not too bad in my book if something is learnt from it
 
We have:

(0 = 0, 0 -> True) -> (0 = 0 -> True) -> 0 = True

but we also define:

0 = empty set

which is false. We can't define 0 as the negated empty set because this implies 0 = 1 = 2 ..., so were stuck with the paradox.
Following on from this we have:
(1 = 1, 1 -> True) -> (1 = 1 -> True) -> 1 = True

And we know 0 = True from the above so it follows 0 = 1.
 
No way: "1 -> True" is not true by the truth table of "therefore". But 1 = True by definition so the paradox follows.
 
Sorry no rule justifies concluding "0 = true" from "0 = 0 -> true", so the "paradox" is void.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X