The human-chimpanzee common ancestor model: The issues.

Wow, I didn't know this sub-forum went back so many years!

Slightly related thread necro: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-49486980
Researchers have discovered a nearly complete 3.8-million-year-old skull of an early ape-like human ancestor in Ethiopia.

An analysis of the new specimen challenges ideas about how the first humans evolved from ape-like ancestors.

The current view that an ape named Lucy was among a species that gave rise to the first early humans may have to be reconsidered.

The discovery is reported in the journal Nature.

The skull was found by Prof Yohannes Haile-Selassie at a place called Miro Dora, which is in the Mille District of Ethiopia's Afar Regional State.
Click to expand...
 
Wow, this OP knows his stuff.... :unsure::p

You can use this stuff ponderer, what do you think?
 
Techne said:
Wow, this OP knows his stuff.... :unsure::p

You can use this stuff ponderer, what do you think?
Click to expand...
Yeah - maybe.
To think that I too was once fooled into believing in the ToE.
Not any more though.

Maybe you can run with it.
I am tiring of Atheists that defend their holy ToE at all costs with/using their special/unique brand of "science" (aka "scientism").
Its a waste of time to use logic with zealots.
 
Ponderer said:
Yeah - maybe.
To think that I too was once fooled into believing in the ToE.
Not any more though.

Maybe you can run with it.
I am tiring of Atheists that defend their holy ToE at all costs with/using their special/unique brand of "science" (aka "scientism").
Its a waste of time to use logic with zealots.
Click to expand...
Hahahaha...logic.
 
Ponderer said:
Yeah - maybe.
To think that I too was once fooled into believing in the ToE.
Not any more though.

Maybe you can run with it.
I am tiring of Atheists that defend their holy ToE at all costs with/using their special/unique brand of "science" (aka "scientism").
Its a waste of time to use logic with zealots.
Click to expand...
Too bad the author accepts the ToE as valid due to ... overwhelming evidence. When you figure out how to read and understand scientific articles you too will get there. Maybe then you will also figure out that the ToE doesn't support atheism in any way (only idiots believe that) and that it is not an argument against creation.
 
Ponderer said:
Yeah - maybe.
To think that I too was once fooled into believing in the ToE.
Not any more though.

Maybe you can run with it.
I am tiring of Atheists that defend their holy ToE at all costs with/using their special/unique brand of "science" (aka "scientism").
Its a waste of time to use logic with zealots.
Click to expand...
Oh the irony :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :laugh:
 
Techne said:
Too bad the author accepts the ToE as valid due to ... overwhelming evidence. When you figure out how to read and understand scientific articles you too will get there. Maybe then you will also figure out that the ToE doesn't support atheism in any way (only idiots believe that) and that it is not an argument against creation.
Click to expand...
There be none so blind as those who do not wish to see.
You have the capacity/ability to understand, but you choose not to.
The ToE is a hoax, but you are refusing/unwilling to see it for the BS ("scientism") it in fact is.

Until such time you are willing to actually discuss something, I am out.
 
Ponderer said:
There be none so blind as those who do not wish to see.
You have the capacity/ability to understand, but you choose not to.
The ToE is a hoax, but you are refusing/unwilling to see it for the BS ("scientism") it in fact is.

Until such time you are willing to actually discuss something, I am out.
Click to expand...
Hey, discuss ERVs hahahaha.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X