Will you pay Twitter $8 a month?

Will you pay Twitter $8 a month?

  • Yes

    Votes: 30 6.1%
  • No

    Votes: 442 89.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 23 4.6%

  • Total voters
    495
I wish they can do the same for Facebook (charge for a post).

Clarification - I don't use either platform so I'm affected. As long as Reddit is "free" I'm happy.
You mean as long as old.reddit.com is free and accessible
 
I go on Twitter to find out what people have to say about things. The blue check was meant to make that easier. I have a feeling it's going to get messy if the blue check suddenly means "someone paid $100/year to be an influencer", or worse, if you have 100 accounts for an individual and no way of knowing if a tweet is authentic.
 
a7hfet0yt4y91.jpg



Thermonuclear name & shame? WTF is he thinking? There are no "activist groups" putting pressure, the advertisers are fleeing this dumpster fire.
Does he think he has a RIGHT to their advertising budget that he can shame them for not spending it on twitter?

I didn't vote in the poll because this question is not relevant to me. It should be directed at Twitter users who currently have blue tick marks already.
I think that anyone being allowed to pay $8 for it, cheapens the blue tick. I personally feel that celebrities, sports stars, icons and businesses should be the only ones to have those ticks, or be entitled to pay for it. I use Twitter regularly to contact businesses and government departments. How do I know it's the real City Power, Joburg Water, Metro Police or a famous grilled chicken company? It's the blue tick!

Companies and government departments tend to ignore you until you tag them and take the issue on Twitter. Those of you not on the platform may think it's all nonsense gossip, but I promise you that businesses respond much quicker when you expose them on Twitter! Employees get fired, contracts get cancelled and online articles get written based on tweets. So I'm afraid it's kind of a big deal.
From my experience with CoJ it makes zero difference - they don't care.
 
those who believe their future/situation/feelings are their responsibility vs those who believe their future/situation/feelings are the responsibility of others
That's definitely left vs right, respectively.
 
I didn't vote in the poll because this question is not relevant to me. It should be directed at Twitter users who currently have blue tick marks already.
I think that anyone being allowed to pay $8 for it, cheapens the blue tick. I personally feel that celebrities, sports stars, icons and businesses should be the only ones to have those ticks, or be entitled to pay for it. I use Twitter regularly to contact businesses and government departments. How do I know it's the real City Power, Joburg Water, Metro Police or a famous grilled chicken company? It's the blue tick!
I can agree you shouldn't get the tick just for paying some money, because then it is meaningless, but I don't see why only celebrities et al should be allowed to have a blue tick if it means this user has been verified to be who they say they are.

What i find so funny about this, is that we all know if the idea and the $8 per month, came from some rando hipster at Twitter everybody would be saying what an awesome idea it is. Elon comes up with it and the world hates it lol.
Maybe. Musk is an ass, so people don't like him. But I think people would have been resistant regardless of who introduced the fee.

He never has been good at understanding people. He should be leveraging off his PR team..
Are there PR people crazy enough to work for him. Must be a really frustrating job.

3. Elon says comedy is now legal on twitter (always was? I guess he means stuff that the "woke" "leftist" "activists" censored, but which the anti-woke right views as humour?)
Well he's effectively backtracked on allowing all types of humour.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X