Weep! I spent over a decade in an R&D facility. Our premier scientific institute (the CSIR) also produces, highly dubious, output.
Sounds like we both worked for same boss before! You are right there are many issues CSIR faces. Some are unique to divisions while some are cross the board. I worked for NRE, formerly CSIR Mining Technology Division and we produced very good outputs. Without CSIR Mining Technology, there would never exist programs like Deepmine, Coaltech 2020, Platmine which have contributed immensely in mining industry. The biggest problems with our division were:
- after Dr. Geoff Gareth, there has been lack of leadership and vision in the CSIR. It was apparent during Geoff days that things were deteriorating but Sibisi was not the right appointment in my view.
- decrease in industry participation in technology transfer. this step is crucial during proposal stages of any research project else the findings remain at the library.
- when i worked at CSIR, our recoverable target was something like 2.7. this means CSIR is running at overhead costs of 1.7 times a person's salary. so a lot government and industry money goes to paying huge overheads. this will affect research quantity and quality outputs.
- succession policy: the is a big gap between seasoned professionals and young researchers with little middle-level professionals. this means there is not enough time to transfer knowledge to young researchers. again this affects quantity and quality of research outputs.
- staff retention: due to many reasons, old and new people tend to leave the CSIR for greener pastures. CSIRO (Australia), CANMET (Canada), NIOSH (USA) are experiencing similar problems. Interestingly, Geoff Gareth (former CSIR CEO) left SA to head CSIRO.
I will be interested to hear from a University and Private R&D point of view.