DA ‘took money from Guptas’

doubletrouble

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
1,421
Reaction score
197
Cape Town - DA leader Helen Zille has been accused of a “serious case” of hypocrisy by gunning for the influential Gupta family – this while she had gone cap in hand to the Guptas and had come away with “substantial” donations for her party.

While Zille this week publicly snubbed the Guptas – the founders and majority shareholders of The New Age newspaper and controversial backers of President Jacob Zuma – by pulling out of a New Age breakfast briefing following reports the breakfasts were sponsored by cash-strapped state-owned enterprises, sources told Weekend Argus that the party had in the past been a beneficiary of the billionaire Gupta brothers.

A well-placed source confirmed that Zille had gone to the Gupta’s sprawling compound in Saxonwold, Johannesburg in 2011 to personally ask for a donation and had emerged with a “substantial” cheque. It is believed the Gupta’s donation ran to several hundred thousand rands.

Highly-placed government insiders on Saturday took a swipe at Zille, saying her hypocrisy was “shocking”.



When approached for comment on Saturday, Zille *****footed around the issue, neither denying nor confirming that her party had benefited generously from the controversial family.

“The issue is not whether the Guptas have ever donated money to the DA,” Zille said when asked whether she or her party had received any funding from the Guptas.

“The issue is, if they did, whether the DA ever channelled huge amounts of public money to them in return. The answer is no.”

Zille added that the problem was not that the Guptas were ANC donors, but that they should not be benefactors of President Zuma.

“As with Schabir Shaik, it creates a major conflict of interest. The problem is, in return, if they get significant business advantages from the state (including State Owned Enterprises). That is the issue.

“What we have here is the ANC in government paying huge amounts of money to the ANC in business, who in turn gives large sums to the ANC as a party and the president’s family,” she countered.

The Gupta brothers were travelling abroad this weekend and could not be contacted for comment.

DA insiders said media reports dating back to 2011 had made mention of suspicions that the party had accepted funds from the Guptas, but because the DA had centralised its funding operations only a handful of key party members in the inner circle were aware of who the main party funders are.

“Nobody knows when or how much money was donated,” another party source said.

There has for some time been a drive to get the government to review the issue of transparency in political party financing.

The DA, like the ANC, does not reveal details about donors who in the past controversially included German fraudster Jurgen Harksen as well as slain businessman Brett Kebble.
http://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/da-took-money-from-guptas-1.1459221#disqus_thread
 
Ok then...:erm:
Nothing new here. Political party getting donations from private businesses is not new.
 
Damn if only she had thought of that spin when the story originally came to light.
 
Right... pull the other one.
Politics works this way : You scratch my back, I scratch yours. To believe otherwise is simply naive.

DA does not do financial favours.

Never said that a donor cannot benefit in other ways. I'm an active member of my local ward and while I've never received any financial benefit, it has come in handy when I needed to escalate an issue I had.
 
I'm getting pissed off at the DA.

The other day the one DA person from the Freestate asking that there to be a investiagtion into police shooting at the people attacking the police station in Zamdela.

And now this hypocrisy with the Guptas and the breakfasts.
 
Ok, correct me if I'm wrong but, the DA took a donation from the Guptas then later "snubbed" the Guptas for doing something wrong? Does taking money from someone make the immune to later criticism? Is this a type of retro-active hypocrisy.
 
Not a good way to start a monday morning marine....

Of course the DA does er "favours "
 
What matters most is that when she realised the full extent of the symbiotic relationship the Guptas have with the state, she cut ties with them. She has my respect for that.

Politics and big business go hand in hand. Big business benefit more than anyone when it comes to a stable political climate, so donations to political parties should not be a bad thing. It does become bad however when said politicians promise a "return on investment" for the money.
 
in the DA being a big donor is not going to get you any financial favours.

^^^ This.

Our Church has the same policy, we don't ask where the money comes from, but don't be expecting any special treatment just because you made a donation.
I'm sure the DA doesn't care where the money comes from, as long as it is not Tax money (except of course for the normal state contribution that all political parties get).

But now that the Gupta's have emerged as themselves being the recipients of Public money, then the DA will most likely not be taking cash from them again.

I fail to see the problem here?
Are we going to dredge up every single past transaction in the hopes of trying to find some crap that stinks?
You will be here for the rest of your life....
 
Ok, correct me if I'm wrong but, the DA took a donation from the Guptas then later "snubbed" the Guptas for doing something wrong? Does taking money from someone make the immune to later criticism? Is this a type of retro-active hypocrisy.

I don't think its really hypocrisy.

Firstly its not a personal donation, its a donation to the party and that happens all the time, there is no problem with that.

Secondly taking a donation does not mean that the political party in question can not take a stance against the donors. IF the didn't then that would mean that they could be bought, so to me that is the polar opposite of hypocrisy.

The ANC took personal donations from the Gutpa's and the allowed them to gain advantage and get money back, there is a big difference.
 
So the Guptas have T&Cs attached money they funded to the ANC, just not to the DA?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X