Ubiquiti UniFi enterprise WiFi at home

Azimuth

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Messages
2,314
Reaction score
89
Location
Null
Let me start off by saying that I've been searching for the ultimate in wireless for the last 7 years. I've run the whole gauntlet of devices, from Netgear, to D-Link, Billion, SMC, Apple etc.

Almost always there's the same stumbling block: signal propagation throughout the home. Inevitably people try larger antennas or repeating. On this note, I had one particular setup which was stellar and near flawless with wireless repeating - the Apple AirPort range. This is what I basically upgraded from - 3 Airport AP's with 2 repeating. Didn't have perfect zero hand-off though.

After my experience with another Ubiquiti product and a rather frustrating wireless roaming issue, I turned to UniFi. Besides for the novel mounting methods and aesthetics, I was particlarly drawn to UniFi's claims of zero-handoff technology. I was also all for PoE. Another trump card for the UniFi range is the seamless addition of other access points - I think up to 100 units - without any performance degradation or roaming issues.

This is what I came home with from Scoop:

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395146503.112965.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395146516.815342.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395146539.890549.jpg

Not pictured is the loot from the second trip. :D Taking the first UniFi-LR out the box, I felt quite excited. I was greeted by this sleek enterprise-class device that I hoped would finally be the ultimate in wireless.

I opted to skip 5.8GHz and remain on old trusty 2.4GHz. I didn't have an issue with 2.4GHZ spectrum availability anyway. I also shied away from 802.11ac and remained with 802.11n. It is an as-yet unproven technology and the cost is pretty exhorbitant - 300% more than 802.11n.

Techcnical specifics aside, the unit is quite small - 25cm in diameter. Its LED come in the form of a concentric slit in the dome where the LED shines through. The halo effect is quite pleasing. I have to immediately compare these to the domineering Cisco APs. Not only are the Ciscos outdated they are fugly. They don't even surface mount properly. Most lot of the installations I've seen the installer leaves off the back cover and the device is somewhat exposed.

Mounting was really easy. Supply power to the unit was not. By this I mean the obligatory roof crawing. *Spit* After checking for branders, I marked out the base plate holes with a braddle. I then drilled an 8mm hole for the network cable.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395146583.381732.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395146594.732125.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395146656.467445.jpg

qu2e9ebu.jpg


For PoE supply I decided to go use a Ubiquiti TOughSwitch Pro. This thing is basically carrier-class as two of them make up the official carrier units. Voltage supplied is a standard 24V with the option to increase to 48V for UniFi Outdoor units. This is basically what sets the Pro apart from the standard ToughSwitch.

Once each end was terminated I tested for continuity.

muta7ene.jpg


This is especially important with PoE. I imagine your device would blow if the power is not delivered on the correct cable pairs (either way, I didn't want to test this theory!). Even more imporant is not using PoE powered network cable for anything else!! So what do I do while testing? I forgot to disconnect my continuity tester which went with a loud POP and a burning smell. Ugh!

Configuration of each AP

The biggest challenge came with seeting up the UniFi's. I installed 3 in total. There is no 192.168.1.1 home page. Instead, you need to use Ubiquiti controller software. Once installed on host computer connected to the network, you need to "adopt" all Unifi APs. Then they are provisioned into the network. Weird indeed. You adopt an AP by dragging and dropping it on the deployment area map. From there things become really simple, especially with repeated use of the UniFi controller.

The cool party trick

A VERY nice feature for UniFi is Google API integration. For me, obtaining house plans to manage the whole network is not very feasible. Getting a Google Earth image is. So while other manufacturers have wirless controller appliances, Ubiquiti have achieved this with a software controller which has zero licensing costs. At a glance you can ping an AP, check which APs have no power, estimate signal coverage, client management, bandwidth management, hotspot management, etc.

An obstacle for me was having a host computer, running the software controller, powered and on the network 100% of the time. So I'm personally not using the software controller to the best of my ability because I don't leave any PC's running. I'm going to investiagte using somelike like Tanaza cloud service for this purpose. I have a lot of wireless clients between sites now and some of bandwidth hogs. Until mobile data becomes cheaper (35-50Mbps LTE chows it up real fast), I need to keep an eye on things. Edit: Tanaza is way too costly, around R200pm.

The end result and performance

The day-to-day performance of these units is nothing short of amazing, to me at least. No downtime, zero hand-off is a reality, multi-site wireless roaming as is the UniFi fundamental promise, great coverage, perfect mesh network.

I was wondering what they'd look like at night and if they might interfere with sleep if a bedroom door was left open.

qe6y9eta.jpg


9etury7e.jpg


The effect isn't all that bad and actually gives a kind of "guiding light" during midnight trips to the kitchen. :D My 8-month old also loves them, they're pure UFO to him. The light is very dull and you'd never be able to read with it. Just happy it's not invasive.

Edit: here is a wonderful primer on UniFi for anyone interested...

http://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi/...ual-and-beyond/m-p/110107/highlight/true#M170
 
Last edited:
Try Digital Ocean for the cloud hosting. It's a bit cheaper than R200pm and if you're prepared to do a bit of digging, you can find a Linux version of the software controller that works fine on the Digital Ocean Droplets. It's a nice way of managing several sites as well, although I don't personally require that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me start off by saying that I've been searching for the ultimate in wireless for the last 7 years. I've run the whole gauntlet of devices, from Netgear, to D-Link, Billion, SMC, Apple etc.

I think only in the consumer area though?
What did the setup cost you?

There are APs that provide higher throughputs, better coverage and have better interference handling - but you need to decide at what point the value and cost is too much for your personal installation and if your priority is performance, cost or a balance of the two.
 
Try Digital Ocean for the cloud hosting. It's a bit cheaper than R200pm and if you're prepared to do a bit of digging, you can find a Linux version of the software controller that works fine on the Digital Ocean Droplets. It's a nice way of managing several sites as well, although I don't personally require that.

Thanks for the tip, I'll definitely investigate that.
 
I think only in the consumer area though?
What did the setup cost you?

Yip, those aren't enterprise. Many, many times over the years I wanted to use Cisco. Besides for the prohibitive cost, not too long ago there wasn't any 802.11n. Also no MIMO.

Then there was Draytek. Again I never bit the bullet. Within the last year I wanted to try the monstrous MikroTik RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN but ultimately chose Ubiquiti UniFi instead. I'm happy I held off because I can promise you this is the beatbox the best for home WiFi. If you can afford 802.11ac and rely on lots of file transfers, then all the better. I don't copy over the network though. In fact I don't move any files.

In terms of cost, each UniFi-LR cost R950+VAT, the 5-port TouchSwitch (deployed at Site 2) was R975+VAT and the 8-port ToughSwitch Pro (Site 1) was R2075+VAT.

There are APs that provide higher throughputs, better coverage and have better interference handling - but you need to decide at what point the value and cost is too much for your personal installation and if your priority is performance, cost or a balance of the two.

For sure, this stuff isn't cheap at all but it's plausible that a home office user might spring for Telkom fixed IP which would include a pricey Cisco wireless router.

My whole network is wireless and I have a lot of wireless clients. The network gets hammered at times and the wireless needs to cope. I was also never happy with low signal in places, I wanted *full* signal everywhere. Even the main bathroom. (Hey magazines are now out...) The UniFi solution gave me just that.
 
Last edited:
UniFi is lekker, you can disable the LED should it be a disturbance. Many installs happening with UniFi, it also have a hotspot system which you can optimise to secure your network on an “open” basis. However, UniFi is limited when it comes down to individual strength and multi-tenancy where Ruckus kicks ass.
 
Here's the final result at Site 1...

TV lounge area:

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395157218.483522.jpg

Bedroom area:

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395157226.450515.jpg

Both are left on auto output power. I wasn't keen to run one unit at max power - 28dB IIRC - all the time.
 
We got a shedload of these babies.

Installing at the office, it's pure joy to configure and use! :D

Configure one, and adopt the rest, they come calling to you, you don't need to do any more work.

I found that you can go from point A to point B without any funny issues, whereas the previous AP's we were using was not so good at that. (Another issue was that they was drawing too much power from the HP core switch - HP core switch kept on issuing a warning about a device drawing too much power. So glad we kicked the old stuff out).

Just a word of warning if you've got a PoE switch (HP/Cisco etc) - keep in mind those PoE switches kick out 48v, higher than the rated 12v for the Unifi's... and you may damage some expensive kit...

And these are so minimally intrusive. Mount 'em where you want 'em - and forget about them...



One thing I've found out is that if you've got (say more than three) configured on the same PC and the same network segment, and you move the one Unifi to a different segment, the Unifi software will mark that specific Unifi as either missing, disconnected or partitioned and will not be able to talk to it - and the segmented Unifi will not be able to authenticate etc without the first Unifi present.

Not sure how it works though... but it sure kicks ass when it comes to tracking errant bandwidth usage :cool:

You can see all the devices connected to a particular Unifi, and disconnect the rogue devices should you want to. No sweat, fuss, or messing around with things, just a >point<>clickety<>click< and you're done.
 
Last edited:
I'm using this PoE switch:

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1395175508.831736.jpg

You have to specifically configure a port to do more than 24V. The port LED colour also changes accordingly. I agree it is risky. I want to tag the port that uses 48V so I don't mix up the cables. Soon I will be dropping in my UniFi Outdoor+ which needs 48V.
 
Here's a bit more detail on the UniFi controller. As mentioned before, it has to be ON to collect data. As you can see, I don't have much data to analyse and all the wireless clients aren't registered either.

Screen Shot 2014-03-18 at 10.55.35 PM.png

Screen Shot 2014-03-18 at 10.57.13 PM.jpg

Screen Shot 2014-03-18 at 11.18.54 PM.jpg

Screen Shot 2014-03-18 at 11.19.20 PM.jpg

Screen Shot 2014-03-18 at 11.19.55 PM.jpg
 
Now you're talking. I don't want the WISP police to come knocking, especially since I'm not a WISP.
 
Oh noez, someone mentioned enterprise and wifi but left out Ruckus

:rolleyes:

These APs are designed to scale up for large deployments, not to mention that Ubiquiti have been in the wireless space for a long time and a number of WISPs have built their networks using their equipment. Hardly the home use only type manufacturer you are insinuating.
 
I'm using this PoE switch:

View attachment 106376

You have to specifically configure a port to do more than 24V. The port LED colour also changes accordingly. I agree it is risky. I want to tag the port that uses 48V so I don't mix up the cables. Soon I will be dropping in my UniFi Outdoor+ which needs 48V.

Nice, however I would use shielded CAT5 as to make sure the Unifi's are grounded... Ubiquity equipment is prone to ESD induced LAN port failure. If I'm not mistaken the install guide requires shielded cable.
 
While that is the ideal, I doubt every install requires it. I'm certainly not going back into the roof to redo it all! :p
 
Nice, however I would use shielded CAT5 as to make sure the Unifi's are grounded... Ubiquity equipment is prone to ESD induced LAN port failure. If I'm not mistaken the install guide requires shielded cable.

It actually recommends TOUGHCable™ which is a Ubiquity product.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X