keppy
Member
Hi All,
Just wondering what the general feeling of the community is on this one. I currently have HomeDSL 384 installed at home. I'm moving to a new address. Telkom claim that there's no infrastructure to support my installation. I cannot beleive that they don't have infrastructure in that area. Maybe they've run short on ports or whatever.
My view of the contract I signed is that I'm bound to fullfill my obligations to the contract for 2 years. Pay every month on time, not cancel, etc. My feeling is that a contract works both ways, and that they should be obliged to have infrastructure available. Especially in an area where to my knowledge ADSL is available!
Could Telkom be viewed in breach of contract by not having infrastructure available? Are their ground to take this up legally?
Anyone on the forum live in Dunvegan, bordering Bedfordview? The place I'm moving is just off Boeing Rd, East. Curious to know if anyone on the forum can confirm ADSL services in that Area.
Thanks,
Keppy
Just wondering what the general feeling of the community is on this one. I currently have HomeDSL 384 installed at home. I'm moving to a new address. Telkom claim that there's no infrastructure to support my installation. I cannot beleive that they don't have infrastructure in that area. Maybe they've run short on ports or whatever.
My view of the contract I signed is that I'm bound to fullfill my obligations to the contract for 2 years. Pay every month on time, not cancel, etc. My feeling is that a contract works both ways, and that they should be obliged to have infrastructure available. Especially in an area where to my knowledge ADSL is available!
Could Telkom be viewed in breach of contract by not having infrastructure available? Are their ground to take this up legally?
Anyone on the forum live in Dunvegan, bordering Bedfordview? The place I'm moving is just off Boeing Rd, East. Curious to know if anyone on the forum can confirm ADSL services in that Area.
Thanks,
Keppy