The Baby 'Samantha' Murder and Rape Trial

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,602
Reaction score
10,245
Location
District 9
Johannesburg - A man accused of raping and killing his daughter didn’t want an autopsy performed on her.

He was so insistent that the baby’s body be cremated without being dissected that he punched an undertaker’s employee.

This emerged in the Johannesburg High Court sitting in the Protea Magistrate’s Court on Monday, where the 37-year-old man and his 34-year-old girlfriend are on trial for their baby’s murder.

When 10-month-old Samantha* died, she had multiple injuries and bruises on her body. Her ribs were fractured and there was a laceration on her right lung - which was also filled with blood.

The baby also had abrasions on her vagina, and her anus showed signs of having been penetrated multiple times.

While her father said he was distraught and wanted answers as to what had caused her death, he just didn’t want to see his baby’s tiny body cut up, the court has heard.

Testifying in court on Monday, Samantha’s father said he punched the Avbob employee because he had been emotionally unstable and frustrated at the death of his child.

He said he also wanted the baby’s body cremated as it was cheaper.

This was disputed by prosecutor Riana Williams, who told the man he was opposed to the autopsy because he was afraid of what this would unearth.

“You were scared of what we would find if we opened the little body and saw the damage caused over a period of time,” Williams said.

The man denied this.

Dr Jessica Clair Meddows-Taylor, who performed a post-mortem on Samantha, said the baby’s injuries were so severe that she would have been miserable, unhappy and crying all the time.

The father, however, said he had not noticed any injuries.

This was despite the fact that he slept beside Samantha on the same bed and in the same bedroom, while his girlfriend slept with the baby’s twin brother in the lounge.

He said they were told at the hospital that Samantha had colic and he thought this was the cause of her constant crying.

He said he did not harm Samantha, and his girlfriend had been unhappy, moody and miserable since their baby daughter returned from a foster mother’s home to stay with them.

His girlfriend used to shout at their daughter a lot. “She once smacked my daughter on the left hand side of her body,” he said.

The man dismissed as untrue allegations that he once called his daughter “a bitch”.

The court also heard that Samantha’s parents had wanted an abortion, but went ahead with the pregnancy.



Samantha was two weeks old when her parents gave her to a female acquaintance to raise her. When she was three months old, they took her back, only to give her to another woman soon afterwards. They got to know the woman from seeing her buy beer where they lived.

However, they took Samantha back when the woman and her husband wanted the baby’s grant money.

Four months later, paramedics found the baby dead at her parents’ home.

The couple face charges of murder, rape, child abuse, assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm, and sexual assault.

Both have pleaded not guilty to the charges, but may not be named in order to protect the identity of their other children. The trial continues.

* Not the baby’s real name.

The Star
http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/dad-opposed-autopsy-after-baby-s-death-1.1575550#.Ui774D8j65J
 
Last edited:
Sickening. The only solace is that this guy will be gang raped in prison when they find out what he's in prison for.
 
The court also heard that Samantha’s parents had wanted an abortion, but went ahead with the pregnancy.

They should have just had the abortion :(

However, they took Samantha back when the woman and her husband wanted the baby’s grant money

makes you wonder if they did not have the abortion because they saw $$ i.e. free money.
also, is it a good idea to be giving people money to have kids!!
 
Last edited:
God I hope the responsible ones pay very very dearly for this tragedy.
 
Lying sick pervert,I feel like punching him in the balls repeatedly.
 
Dad flees baby rape, murder judgment

Johannesburg - Adriaan Netto, the 37-year-old father accused of raping and murdering his 10-month-old baby, is a wanted man after failing to show up at court on Thursday morning for judgment.

Instead of arriving at court to hear whether or not he has been found guilty of killing his tiny daughter, Netto fled from his home early Thursday morning.

Netto – who can now be identified because he is a fugitive – and his 34- year-old lover, who cannot be named to protect the identities of their other children, are alleged to have abused the baby over a period of time.

They were charged with murder, rape, assault, child abuse and sexual assault.

After their arrest the couple were released on bail of R3 000 each, and pleaded not guilty to the charges.

During the trial both parents claimed they did not know what had caused the baby’s severe injuries that led to her death. She had also been malnourished and underweight.

Two days ago, on the last day of the trial, Judge Majake Mabesele said this was a difficult case and he would need time to ponder the matter and postponed the case to Thursday for judgment.

The matter was supposed to have started at 9.30am at the Johannesburg High Court sitting at Protea Magistrate’s Court, but neither of the accused were present. Just before 10am the mother arrived alone.

Netto’s lawyer, advocate Anneline Roestorf, told the judge that she had called her client’s phone several times but had been unable to reach him.



Samantha’s mother said Netto had woken on Thursday morning, taken his clothes and left their home.

After pondering this sudden turn of events, the judge told the investigator, Lieutenant Colonel Gert Kruger: “I want that man here.”

He said Netto’s bail was to be immediately forfeited.

Kruger had opposed bail for the accused during their application. Speaking outside court, Samantha’s mother said Netto had gone out on Wednesday night and arrived home drunk.

“He said he would sleep under a tree rather than miss his children’s developments like crawling and walking. He packed his clothes and said he was leaving.”

She said he left their home at about 7am. The couple have two other children – Samantha’s twin and another baby born in March.

The children are in the care of family members.

The woman said she had run after Netto, who had also taken the transport money they were supposed to use in coming to court.

“He said: ‘If you want to go jail you can go on your own.’ I did not know what to do because I did not have transport money.

“I had to beg taxi drivers to drop me off at Leratong Hospital. I went to my uncle’s house and we came together to court,” she said.

A warrant of arrest has been issued for Netto.

[email protected]

The Star
 
They should have just had the abortion :(

makes you wonder if they did not have the abortion because they saw $$ i.e. free money.
also, is it a good idea to be giving people money to have kids!!

i love my son so much, that i sometimes wonder what have been worse, if he was aborted and i never got to have such a beautiful kid change my life, sit on the chair hugging me and playing video games with me, or if he wasn't aborted, but was in a family with a monster like this.

if i could take time off work i'd hunt this ****er down
 
Netto – who can now be identified because he is a fugitive – and his 34- year-old lover, who cannot be named to protect the identities of their other children

He can be named because he's a fugitive but she can't to protect their kids :wtf:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X