Yup, Sport administration seems to attact the worst.... Another story to make you pull your hair out...
City To city Ultra cancelled due to the greed of the the two Gauteng athletics bodies....
https://runningmann.co.za/2026/08/31/real-reason-city-to-city-was-cancelled/
A bit of both, but much prefer fidelity and sound quality than big bass. So yeah, more interested in sound quality than excessive volume. Honestly, doesn't even need to be 2.1, would be happy with high quality 2,0 speakers.
From my understanding it's not simple, but certain landing approaches would require it to be disabled. It' doesn't activate if the flaps and gear are down as it assumes landing but I imagine certain approaches(like the old Hong kong airport) would need it to be disabled before the gear comes down.
Been looking for decent 2.1 Speakers for my PC for a while, go online, look around, read reviews, think i have something worth getting. End up not buying anything and sticking with headphones...
Most modern airshows don't allow aircraft to fly directly over spectators, mainly due to a number of rather horrifying airshow accidents that killed spectators in the past.
My assumptions are based on the very clear evidence that this lower than any previous flyby, However, if someone has actual evidence that they fully intended to fly that low then am more than happy to change my mind.
Can you tell us more about this "trusted friend" who "definitely knows"? No...
I think what is being lost in this discussion is that perhaps there was no intention to go that low. The trailing aircraft seemed at a far more sensible height. I doubt Airlink would ever admit to one of their pilots misjudging their approach but maybe this is exactly what happened.
Perhaps...