Israeli forces attack worshippers in Al-Aqsa Mosque raid

DreamKing said:
what's wrong with it?

not only the10 kids, their families and friends will be captured and executed. more than thousands of years, it is how to govern a piece occupied land with people before WW2.

either you executed all people on the land or terrify them not to resist, you choose. ;)
Click to expand...

That why you sitting quiet in SA sucking up the persecution? ;)
 
The religion of peacers ramming cars into tourists and shooting girls to go along with the rocket attacks. Typical of the savages
 
You ^$%#@ers attacked Israel in 1967 with about SEVEN Arab countries.
You got your asses kicked. By all rights, they should have taken and kept every one of those countries.
Instead, they gave most of everything back. So that you can continue to harass and kill.
You have no right to moan.
 
Glock26 said:
You ^$%#@ers attacked Israel in 1967 with about SEVEN Arab countries.
Click to expand...
Israel preemptively attacked Egypt because they claimed Egypt was planning an attack, since Egypt had amassed troops on the border after they falsely believed Israel had amassed troops on the border.

Egypt had a defence agreement with the surrounding Arab countries, they were all then obliged to attacked attack Israel after being attacked first.
 
Last edited:
Vorastra said:
Israel preemptively attacked Egypt because they claimed Egypt was planning an attack, since Egypt had amassed troops on the border after they falsely believed Israel had amassed troops on the border.

Egypt had a defence agreement with the surrounding Arab countries, they were all then obliged to attacked attack Israel after being attacked first.
Click to expand...
Let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?
The generally accepted FACTS are the following.
In May 1967, following misinformation about Israeli intentions provided by the Soviet Union, Egypt expelled UN peacekeepers who had been stationed in the Sinai Peninsula since the Suez conflict, and announced a blockade of Israel's access to the Red Sea (international waters) via the Straits of Tiran, which Israel considered an act of war. Tension escalated, with both sides' armies mobilising.
Nasser knew that his blockade of the Straits of Tiran from Israeli vessel passage, on 23 May 1967, might very likely provide Israel with reason to launch war. His decisions to ask for the removal of the UN peacekeepers from Sinai and especially to block the Gulf of Aqaba to Israeli shipping via the Straits of Tiran, are commonly accepted as the point where war became inevitable.
If Wikipedia isn't factual enough (and we all know it isn't always factual) you can confirm the above via Encyclopedia Britannica, Columbia University and other non biased sites. Please spare me quotes from the anfi defamation league and other biased sources.
 
Glock26 said:
His decisions to ask for the removal of the UN peacekeepers from Sinai and especially to block the Gulf of Aqaba to Israeli shipping via the Straits of Tiran, are commonly accepted as the point where war became inevitable.
Click to expand...

yeah but you don't say who shot the first shot...
 
saturnz said:
yeah but you don't say who shot the first shot...
Click to expand...
Ah. I see.
So if the criminal doesn't get off the first shot, it's the victim's fault for not waiting for him to shoot first.
I get it now.
 
Glock26 said:
Let's not let facts get in the way of a good story, right?
The generally accepted FACTS are the following.
In May 1967, following misinformation about Israeli intentions provided by the Soviet Union, Egypt expelled UN peacekeepers who had been stationed in the Sinai Peninsula since the Suez conflict, and announced a blockade of Israel's access to the Red Sea (international waters) via the Straits of Tiran, which Israel considered an act of war. Tension escalated, with both sides' armies mobilising.
Nasser knew that his blockade of the Straits of Tiran from Israeli vessel passage, on 23 May 1967, might very likely provide Israel with reason to launch war. His decisions to ask for the removal of the UN peacekeepers from Sinai and especially to block the Gulf of Aqaba to Israeli shipping via the Straits of Tiran, are commonly accepted as the point where war became inevitable.
If Wikipedia isn't factual enough (and we all know it isn't always factual) you can confirm the above via Encyclopedia Britannica, Columbia University and other non biased sites. Please spare me quotes from the anfi defamation league and other biased sources.
Click to expand...
You just said the same thing I said with more words.

Israel attacked Egypt first. Yes.

The other countries attacked Israel due to defence agreement. Yes.

Which of these points, which I made earlier, is wrong.
 
Anyone who justifies what Israel is doing is either devoid of any sense, divisive or has no real understanding of what is truly happening. The manner in which Palestinians are living is worse than the Apartheid government treated people of colour in South Africa. The Apartheid government use to restrict movement and privilege but not in the manner the Israeli’s are. They forcing Palestinians into enclaves, deliberately oppressing and antagonising them, and getting a kick out of it. Its Apartheid on crack.
 
Neptuner said:
Anyone who justifies what Israel is doing is either devoid of any sense, divisive or has no real understanding of what is truly happening. The manner in which Palestinians are living is worse than the Apartheid government treated people of colour in South Africa. The Apartheid government use to restrict movement and privilege but not in the manner the Israeli’s are. They forcing Palestinians into enclaves, deliberately oppressing and antagonising them, and getting a kick out of it. It’s Apartheid on crack.
Click to expand...

So what do you suggest the Israelis do against a people led by hard core fundamentalists sworn to wipe them out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X