Israeli forces attack worshippers in Al-Aqsa Mosque raid

[FrankCastle]

Sure shooting stun grenades and raiding a place of worship is the right thing to do, right?

You can't be worshipping at a place of worship if your goal is to illegally barricade yourself within the building waiting for the inevitable break in and invasion by Israeli forces and respond with fireworks plus some grainy footage to sell to the world.

You think Palestinian youths were there to negotiate?

 

[rambo919]

You can't be worshipping at a place of worship if your goal is to illegally barricade yourself within the building waiting for the inevitable break in and invasion by Israeli forces and respond with fireworks plus some grainy footage to sell to the world.

You think Palestinian youths were there to negotiate?

You know, if there is any mass disgust from Muslims that people do this kind of desecration in the name of Allah.... they are being awfully quiet about it.....

 

[FrankCastle]

Death to Christians’: Violence steps up under new Israeli gov’t​

Who would have thought

The article alludes to radicalized Ultra Orthodox Jewish youths as the main perpetrators of these attacks.

 

[Vorastra]

Just to throw this out there.
Jesus wasn't Christian, that term only found footing later while the disciples were preaching, but perhaps this is just semantics.

anti-semantics

 

[FrankCastle]

You know, if there is any mass disgust from Muslims that people do this kind of desecration in the name of Allah.... they are being awfully quiet about it.....

They'll soon come up with some narration that when it comes to standing up against the enemy, mosques can be desecrated and shoes can be worn inside etc.

 

[rambo919]

The article alludes to radicalized Ultra Orthodox Jewish youths as the main perpetrators of these attacks.

Yeah these oakes are becoming as much of a threat as the Jihadi's are, too many parallels to ignore but no suicide bombings yet at least. Their chief hatered seems reserved for Messianics and Arabs though.

It's ironic how the left in the West goes on about a phantom "far right" threat when one actually exists in Israel and is being barely kept in check.

 

[Grant]

Quite sure.....

I thought it was the Romans who began the persecution.

 

[FrankCastle]

Just to throw this out there.
Jesus wasn't Christian, that term only found footing later while the disciples were preaching, but perhaps this is just semantics.

Jesus wasn't a muslim either according to Islam.

 

[Kieppie]

Jesus wasn't a muslim either according to Islam.

Well Islam was only invented about 7 centuries later so why would He be?

 

[rietrot]

The article alludes to radicalized Ultra Orthodox Jewish youths as the main perpetrators of these attacks.

I doubt it, but it could maybe be posible if there's some Jew that take their religion seriously. It is a confused mess.

 

[rambo919]

I thought it was the Romans who began the persecution.

Yes you thought a great many mistaken things.

 

[rambo919]

Jesus wasn't a muslim either according to Islam.

Actually according to some he was the greatest of all Muslims bar Muhammad..... they tried to appropriate Him early.

 

[Spizz]

Yes you thought a great many mistaken things.

You talk as if your words are facts. I wonder if you know why religion is called a "belief system"? And if so, why would your beliefs over rule those of others?

 

[rambo919]

You talk as if your words are facts. I wonder if you know why religion is called a "belief system"? And if so, why would your beliefs over rule those of others?

Ditto

 

[Spizz]

Ditto

I never mentioned anything about anyone being mistaken, that was you. The question still stands.

 

[rambo919]

I never mentioned anything about anyone being mistaken, that was you. The question still stands.

Was the question honest though? Since this has nothing to do with religion per se but historical fact.

 

[Spizz]

Was the question honest though? Since this has nothing to do with religion per se but historical fact.

Historical fact? There is no evidence that Jesus existed never mind who crucified him or for what reason.

 

[rambo919]

Historical fact? There is no evidence that Jesus existed never mind who crucified him or for what reason.

Except that the Talmud claims he is in hell being boiled in feces..... and there is only no proof if you completely disregard the NT.... and if you do that there is no proof of anyone specifically existing from that time period because there are no full original manuscripts remaining.

This would mean almost all of history is myth and never happened.... no one is making that claim seriously. You are basically on the road to 1984 here where only the present exists.

And all that ignores the fact that no one can seriously believe that millions of people at the time would willingly convert to a belief in a man that never existed if it meant they would be tortured to death for it. You see such a certainty causing people to stop believing.... you never see it causing them to start.

There simply is no explanation for the explosion of early Christianity given the immense panicked persecution of it to stem the tide other than that He actually existed.

 

[Grant]

Yes you thought a great many mistaken things.

That may be so, but you are still labouring under the illusion snakes can talk & men can stroll on water & someone hand built a boat capable of carrying thousands of animal species.
My mistakes pale in comparison.

 

[rambo919]

That may be so, but you are still labouring under the illusion snakes can talk & men can stroll on water & someone hand built a boat capable of carrying thousands of animal species.
My mistakes pale in comparison.

That's an oddly weak whataboutism hill to die on..... a strawman whataboutism to boot.