South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Nobody is forcing anything down your throat. He is a actor. He is not playing a transgender.casting a woman who thinks its a man ???? The whole woke transgender rubbish being forced won our throats? You deny thats woke?
casting a woman who thinks its a man ???? The whole woke transgender rubbish being forced won our throats? You deny thats woke?
Yes, I deny that is woke. Some person appearing in some minor role in some 172 minute movie for a total 6 minutes of screentime (not speaking time, and anything heroic) is not forcing anything down anything. It's not like it's Woke White or Ghostbusters (2016) or whatever.
The right for just made up nonsense that some person plays Achilles when they are not playing Achilles. The left makes up genders, the right makes up other lies.
ftfyNobody is forcing anything down your throat.HeShe isaanactoractress.HeShe is not playing a transgender.
But men playing woman was a thing already since Shakespeare or even before thatftfy
and on a point of order, nobody claimed she is playing a transgender, what is clear for the entire world to see however is a transgender is playing a man ...
Fun fact: Homer never actually wrote that in his original poems. The swan/egg story was added much later by other writers like Euripides.So you don’t have an issue with a fictional character born by hatching out of the egg of a god disguised as a swan being portrayed by a black woman? So woke.
I blame the orphic eggFun fact: Homer never actually wrote that in his original poems. The swan/egg story was added much later by other writers.
He apparently didn’t give any distinctive physical characteristics and wanted the readers to imagine her for themselves so I’m not sure why people are getting worked up.But men playing woman was a thing already since Shakespeare or even before that
FF to end. No need for 1k pages.Mental thread.
Also, there was no 'he' that wrote anything. What we call 'Homer' was in reality a large group of different people who cobbled together verbal re-tellings of poems over centuries. One of them used the term λευκόχερη (leukōlenos) once. For context, Helen is also described as having 3 different eye colours, depending on the version of the poem and the author, and her magical 'birth' is described in multiple different, mutually exclusive ways. The idea that a single reference to λευκόχερη is critically important, and means 'white' as it's used to describe 'white people' (a mostly incoherent, non-scientific term anyway) in the 21st century is patently absurd.He never wrote a physical description of Helen... He wrote "leukolenos" which translates to 'white armed' which, for Homer, was a signifier of status... White arms meant living indoors, not unusual for a literal Spartan princess, who would not be working manually in the sun... so no labourers or farmer's tan for Helen.
He described her hair "kallikomos" which translates to beautiful or noble, nothing more, and her clothing he described as "tanypeplos", meaning elegant.
More than that, nothing. Nada. Zip.
Can't blame you for not reading this whole thread, but 'historic' characters? What?I do find it annoying when historic characters are re-cast as other races.
Must have been traumatising watching Troy (2004)?If the story was written about ancient Greeks, cast Greek looking people.
SheNobody is forcing anything down your throat. He is a actor. He is not playing a transgender.