Most alcohol use has historically revolved around social gatherings.
Over time, the social aspect of our society has been gradually eroded starting with the breakdown of rural communities into cities to support the industrial revolution where people now find themselves surrounded by strangers.
This trend of isolating people has been accelerated by the use of social media where it is no longer necessary to leave your home to interact with people.
With covid and lockdowns, the social aspects of life were severely impacted as in-person interactions were discouraged and even criminalised.
This latest anti-alcohol drive threatens the last vestiges of those large scale social interactions.
At this point it becomes worth asking who benefits from having people increasingly isolated, and who has benefitted from the trend all along.
This I think is getting to the crux of the matter. Along with the fact that you dont need any industrial chemicals supplied by multinational corporations to produce the stuff, if you want to.
The only people benefiting from the breakdown of normal, healthy social structure are the globalists.
I've always had hard rule for myself that I do not drink during the week, but I would binge drink on a night out on the weekend or over a braai, and in my mind that was okay.
As I got older, I realised that a heavy Friday or rough Sunday around the braai was ruining the rest of my weekend/start of the week. So a part of a shift in how I view and consume alcohol was due to my own behaviour. Now I am at a point where I can buy a six-pack of beers, take them to a braai and not even finish them, and what is left I'd have over the following weekend or two.
So, in your opinion, is abstinence during the week, with binging on weekends better or worse than someone who regularly consumes a moderate amount of alcohol? Like me, for instance, who has a beer or a glass of wine almost daily - and then sometimes has a bit more back to back on special or social occasions.
I will be clear, in my opionion, Binge drinking is one of the biggest problems with alcohol consumption, and the primary thing that leads to people having real addiction and severe health complications from it.
But I hadn't yet seen the sheer depths alcohol abuse/addication can go.
I have taken an even stricter approach (for myself) to this while living with someone in active addiction. I don't feel comfortable cracking open a beer on a Saturday to watch rugby/football because then I feel like I am giving them the greenlight to get on it. So yes, in a way I do feel guilty because I see that beer or two as enabling them, but then I ask myself why shouldn't I be allowed to crack a beer open when I get home on a Friday? I know I can have the one beer, enjoy it, and be done, but I know they can't and I don't want to be responsible for that. And yes, there is anger when it's one of the days where they take their drinking too far and not only have I had to limit myself (or not even drink at all), but I have also had to deal with the negatives of their alcoholism.
I have also lived with addicts. My brother went down a very bad path with amphetamines once upon a time, so I am familiar with the whole sober living scenario
But would you, out of your experience, think that alcoholism is an alcohol problem, or is there a deeper underlying mental health issue, which is just in some individuals triggered by alcohol?
Let's stick to the basics of why their's an anti-alcohol rhetoric. The negatives out weigh the positives.. A drink a day isn't worth worrying about, but it rarely stays 1 drink a day.
A
meta-analysis on 83 studies (599,912 drinkers!) found that at age 40, drinking 350 g/week of alcohol (3x 440ml Heinekens every day) shortens life expectancy by 4-5 years. No it wasn't funded by WHO. Is it worth losing 4-5 years of quality life?
The question must also be asked, what are you "giving up" to potentially spare those 4-5 years of quality of life? Because I will trade 4 or 5 years (if that's really the case - remember this article you are quoting is a meta-analysis and not actual research, and probably overlooks many other factors that may be present in the test populations of the various studies), for 50 or 60 odd years of good quality living - and moderate alcohol consumption, provides me just that.
Also, being half European with lots of family still there and visiting often - I have spent countless hours on verandahs and in courtyards listening to octagenerians recant the most amazing tales of lives really lived to the full, and drinking wine or beer together is at the very core of those meetings, and often at the very core of the stories they tell too.
I challenge any of those stating alcohol makes no positive contribution to society to go and experience bringing in the grape harvest in tuscany first hand - and then still make that claim with a straight face.
It looks like the biggest population based study ever done on the impact of alcohol on health was recently published in June 2026,
"Alcohol Intake and Health Study: No Protective Effect at Low Levels, With Mortality Increasing to 1 in 25 at 14 Drinks Per Week", which concluded that there is no benefit at any level of consumption, but 1 drink per day is pretty much not worth worrying about.
But that study did clearly state that men averaging 1 drink per day have a negligible lifetime alcohol-attributable death risk of around 1 in 1000 on average. BUT at 14 drinks weekly (2 per day) the risk of an alcohol-related death jumps to approximately 1 in 25!
None of this is surprising, and similar results would be seen in studies that replace alcohol consumption with any of a hundred-plus other things.