Airlink ultra-low-altitude stadium flyover stunt under official review

This was completely unsafe. To everyone who thinks "wow that was cool" - yeah you're right it was impressive, but lots of things are impressive, it doesn't mean they're sensible. In aviation, airshows now have stricter rules such as you can't fly over the crowd. Why? Well Google is your friend here - people died at airshows because something "spectacular" went wrong. And if you want to listen to some actual pilots talking about this I suggest
. But I know, nothing will change your mind and I'm a stuck in the mud and SA is cool and hold my beer and all that...
Also, if a Taxi drives into you tomorrow, you might die.

IF IF IF IF IF.

Fun police everywhere.
 
Erm... considering Cape Town had a forecasted precipitation 30% last Saturday and this Saturday in Joburg is 25% the likelihood is that someone in legal pointed out that they need any excuse other than admitting that there might be something irregular about the last flyover hence @Gordon_R's explanation is quite possible rather than weather related...
Hmmm its not always precipitation, there are many other things to take into account. I don't know about Jozi but the local weather for Durbs this weekend is terrible in many ways so I would not be surprised if the similar weather systems are impacting Jozi.
 
Hmmm its not always precipitation, there are many other things to take into account. I don't know about Jozi but the local weather for Durbs this weekend is terrible in many ways so I would not be surprised if the similar weather systems are impacting Jozi.

The point is that nobody can predict the weather 3 days in advance, unless you need an excuse.
 
02 September 2026, Johannesburg –

Airlink acknowledges the South African Civil Aviation Authority’s (SACAA) update on the support it is providing in reviewing the flight data and all relevant information relating to the planning, preparation and production of last Saturday’s formation flyby over the Cape Town DHL Stadium.

Similarly, Airlink is grateful for the enthusiastic appreciation that many people have expressed regarding last Saturday’s Cape Town Stadium flyby as well as the valid questions and concerns raised. However, we never intended to become the news or upstage Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry.

Be assured that safety was the first consideration at every stage of the process. As with all flybys we have conducted, it demanded careful planning, rehearsal and the authorisation, support and guidance of the (SACAA) and Air Traffic Navigation Services to ensure it was performed safely.

Both aircraft were flown by crews comprising three senior captains (representing over 75,000 combined flight hours of experience) operating in the roles of commander, co-pilot and safety/technical officer. Each pilot holds an Airline Transport Pilot Licence, the highest level of commercial pilot qualification.

The flyby was performed safely and due to the unprecedented public interest it created, Airlink, on its own initiative, volunteered to provide the “black box” digital flight data recordings to the SACAA to support its compliance review.
Unlike public flight tracking mobile apps that rely on rudimentary satellite positioning information, the DFDRs on modern commercial jetliners are sophisticated devices able to trace over a thousand parameters and data points to present a precise and complex picture – measured in milliseconds - of every control input, power settings, altitude, horizontal and vertical speed, pitch attitude, acceleration and the visual flight patch along with numerous other readings.
Due to the complexity, the number of parameters and other factors to be examined, it is unrealistic to expect immediate feedback and recommendations from the SACAA. Airlink is, and will continue to support the SACAA with its review process.

Although we have also heard the widespread enthusiasm for a flyby at FNB Stadium this weekend, the forecast weather points to unfavourable conditions for a safe formation flyby. It is on this basis that we withdrew the application for a flyby this Saturday. As a sponsor, it was not Airlink’s intention to detract from the rugby test matches between South Africa and New Zealand. We’re sorry to disappoint fans and supporters but safety comes first and we’re also certain the players will provide more than enough on-field excitement.

de Villiers Engelbrecht
CEO
Airlink
 
02 September 2026, Johannesburg –

Airlink acknowledges the South African Civil Aviation Authority’s (SACAA) update on the support it is providing in reviewing the flight data and all relevant information relating to the planning, preparation and production of last Saturday’s formation flyby over the Cape Town DHL Stadium.

Similarly, Airlink is grateful for the enthusiastic appreciation that many people have expressed regarding last Saturday’s Cape Town Stadium flyby as well as the valid questions and concerns raised. However, we never intended to become the news or upstage Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry.

Be assured that safety was the first consideration at every stage of the process. As with all flybys we have conducted, it demanded careful planning, rehearsal and the authorisation, support and guidance of the (SACAA) and Air Traffic Navigation Services to ensure it was performed safely.

Both aircraft were flown by crews comprising three senior captains (representing over 75,000 combined flight hours of experience) operating in the roles of commander, co-pilot and safety/technical officer. Each pilot holds an Airline Transport Pilot Licence, the highest level of commercial pilot qualification.

The flyby was performed safely and due to the unprecedented public interest it created, Airlink, on its own initiative, volunteered to provide the “black box” digital flight data recordings to the SACAA to support its compliance review.
Unlike public flight tracking mobile apps that rely on rudimentary satellite positioning information, the DFDRs on modern commercial jetliners are sophisticated devices able to trace over a thousand parameters and data points to present a precise and complex picture – measured in milliseconds - of every control input, power settings, altitude, horizontal and vertical speed, pitch attitude, acceleration and the visual flight patch along with numerous other readings.
Due to the complexity, the number of parameters and other factors to be examined, it is unrealistic to expect immediate feedback and recommendations from the SACAA. Airlink is, and will continue to support the SACAA with its review process.

Although we have also heard the widespread enthusiasm for a flyby at FNB Stadium this weekend, the forecast weather points to unfavourable conditions for a safe formation flyby. It is on this basis that we withdrew the application for a flyby this Saturday. As a sponsor, it was not Airlink’s intention to detract from the rugby test matches between South Africa and New Zealand. We’re sorry to disappoint fans and supporters but safety comes first and we’re also certain the players will provide more than enough on-field excitement.

de Villiers Engelbrecht
CEO
Airlink

It is almost impossible to predict the weather in Gauteng 3 days in advance. In the case of Cape Town the weather was unfavourable until 4:30pm, so they can squeeze it in if they really want to. IMO the weather excuse is bogus, a pretext for some other reasons which they will not disclose.
 
It is almost impossible to predict the weather in Gauteng 3 days in advance. In the case of Cape Town the weather was unfavourable until 4:30pm, so they can squeeze it in if they really want to. IMO the weather excuse is bogus, a pretext for some other reasons which they will not disclose.
100%

The claim that they volunteered the info to SACAA also differs from SACAA's announcement saying they requested it.
 
Hmmm its not always precipitation, there are many other things to take into account. I don't know about Jozi but the local weather for Durbs this weekend is terrible in many ways so I would not be surprised if the similar weather systems are impacting Jozi.
Usually it moves from us to you but a forecast is a forecast.
 
It is almost impossible to predict the weather in Gauteng 3 days in advance. In the case of Cape Town the weather was unfavourable until 4:30pm, so they can squeeze it in if they really want to. IMO the weather excuse is bogus, a pretext for some other reasons which they will not disclose.
Imho and if I were to bet on this - withdrawing an application is far more preferable than the application being denied and basis for its denial being made public. Also, they could've applied, and if granted, the ultimate decision on weather conditions at the time would've been left to them in any event. Its unusual.
 
Usually it moves from us to you but a forecast is a forecast.

Cutoff-lows move in random semi-unpredictable ways, and this is a very large and disorganised system. That doesn't mean you can't have a forecast, but the medium-range accuracy is significantly less than normal. The general circulation of this COL will move in a large clockwise loop, circling over the interior at least once, before exiting the country via the E-Cape on Mon 7th. Whether it will have any significant effects on the weather in Gauteng is still highly uncertain at this stage.
 
Cutoff-lows move in random semi-unpredictable ways, and this is a very large and disorganised system. That doesn't mean you can't have a forecast, but the medium-range accuracy is significantly less than normal. The general circulation of this COL will move in a large clockwise loop, circling over the interior at least once, before exiting the country via the E-Cape on Mon 7th. Whether it will have any significant effects on the weather in Gauteng is still highly uncertain at this stage.
okkk.png
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X