2007 Cricket World Cup (West Indies) thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingrob
  • Start date Start date
They throw. Full stop. The ICC are blind.

Ahh the world according to you. Careful not to fart you might just burst that bubble you live in!!

But anyway the match just started, lets see how it goes.
 
Ahh the world according to you. Careful not to fart you might just burst that bubble you live in!!

But anyway the match just started, lets see how it goes.

Hehe. Yes, welcome to my world. It is good here. You will find I am a strict but fair ruler :)

Anyway, back to the game...
 
SL must rather go and play in the national baseball league, where you are allowed to throw :sick:
 
Proof that they have illegal bowling actions according to the ICC ? None.
 
Last edited:
how is SL winning an upset?:confused:

ODI Rankings

Australia 50 6375 128
South Africa 40 5017 125
New Zealand 41 4730 115
Sri Lanka 49 5391 110

Theorectically it would be an upset. And with NZ coming off a couple of wins against Aus before the WC, that would back up the "upset" statement.

BTW: NZ 52/2 after 16 overs. RR Last 5 Overs = 5.80
 
ODI Rankings

Australia 50 6375 128
South Africa 40 5017 125
New Zealand 41 4730 115
Sri Lanka 49 5391 110

Theorectically it would be an upset. And with NZ coming off a couple of wins against Aus before the WC, that would back up the "upset" statement.

BTW: NZ 52/2 after 16 overs. RR Last 5 Overs = 5.80

Nah, there are 8 cricket teams in the world that are classed as the best, therefore they cant be an upset. If the Windies beat Aus thats not an upset.
 
Against SA? You can't be serious. They were dominated for 95 overs of the game and were on top for a couple at the end. That is definitely not "far superior".

Against the Black Caps.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X