43.0% 50.2% 43.0%

My googlefoo is strong...

It makes no sense to me either, but I managed to find this on the US WoW forums at least :

Do you understand those numbers? They are based on a ratio of how many players have 70 hunters to how many hunters are in 2200+ arena teams. Do you know how many huntards there are out there? A countless swarm. Do you think they will get in 2200+ arena teams? Of course not. It is well known that hunters have a large, some might say majority, population of knuckledragging, mouthbreathing, gutter-dwelling neanderthal huntards. Do you honestly find those numbers surprising?
Click to expand...

EDIT

Yep, seems to be what it's about - here's a better explanation of it :
A few days ago Kalgan made a post about the populations of player-classes in 1800+ and 2200+ arenas. He did it off a percentage system, with 100% being exactly where 'Blizzard wants' the class to be. He didn't specify what, exactly, that meant, but hunters came in surprisingly low in all brackets, at 43.0 %, 50.2%, and 43.2% in 1800+ 2v2,3v3, and 5v5 respectively.

Ever since, hunter idiots have been posting the numbers rampantly across boards, blathering about their horrible arena PvP abilities and whining for buffs.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Well when I was your heading I thought your Sunwell progression was going backwards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X