67 dead in Bagadad 2day!

alanf85 said:
So peace is a lost cause then:o

If the U.S isn't fighting for peace then are you telling me there is nobody fighting in Iraq for peace:eek: . That's rather sad.

But wait. That means now's your chance. A chance for you lefties to go over to Iraq and to fight for peace. Your time has come.

Put your money were your mouth is and get over there.:cool:
Click to expand...
No. There will be fighting and violence until the US leaves. Then there will be even MORE fighting. But slowly there will be power structures that form for both sides. Those power structures will, one way or another, be able to control the sections of the public they're supposed to represent. The people at the top of those structures can be brought to a negotiating table.

This is the only way that there will be peace in Iraq, and the longer the US stays in the region, the longer that this outcome will be prevented.
 
alanf85 said:
I'll rephrase the question then.

Who would you rather have "win"?

U.S troops
Shia Islamic extremist militia
Sunni Baathist
Al Qaeda
Click to expand...

None thanks...
They all have an agenda, the innocent Iraqi civilians/victims are the only ones who have my support
 
Dobee said:
None thanks...
They all have an agenda, the innocent Iraqi civilians/victims are the only ones who have my support
Click to expand...

You must favour one surely?

Or will you sit on the fence not minding who won.
 
alanf85 said:
You must favour one surely?

Or will you sit on the fence not minding who won.
Click to expand...

No, I favour none of them...

The US started this war on lies, and I certainly don't want them to win, a victory among any of them will be bad for Iraq and even the world.

I could also go on about the US being the beast mentioned in the bible...
 
alanf85 said:
I'll rephrase the question then.

Who would you rather have "win"?

U.S troops
Shia Islamic extremist militia
Sunni Baathist
Al Qaeda
Click to expand...
None of the above.
 
Pity you can't choose none of them because they're the only ones fighting:rolleyes:

I suppose you just have to chose the least worst then. Not so?
 
Alanf do yourself a favour and watch Farenheit 9/11. You owe it to yourself for making up your mind before at least investigating into some facts.
 
What a load of utter crap. That moron Micheal Moore is so deranged. Any damn idiot with a camera can make a documentary supporting his side. It would have been more believable if he actually showed both sides. More like FaranHYPE 9/11
 
marine1 said:
What a load of utter crap. That moron Micheal Moore is so deranged. Any damn idiot with a camera can make a documentary supporting his side. It would have been more believable if he actually showed both sides. More like FaranHYPE 9/11
Click to expand...
He makes a good case, just because you don't agree with him doesn't make it any less valid. I wouldn't regard pieces of evidence such as official government documents (with names later blacked out, by which time it was too late) to be hype or derangement of any sort. Though I'm sure you still believe that there's still WMD's in Iraq :rolleyes: Bush took you gullible twits for a ride, and you all fell for it hook line and sinker.
froggytoo said:
Facts and science in a movie? Sorry then I rather believe the Wiki. :D
Click to expand...
Documentary, not movie.
 
Last edited:
Highflyer_GP said:
He makes a good case, just because you don't agree with him doesn't make it any less valid. I wouldn't regard pieces of evidence such as official government documents (with names later blacked out, by which time it was too late) to be hype or derangement of any sort.

Documentary, not movie.
Click to expand...

Same difference, biased documentarys with to many questions and deliberate witholdings of facts, they do it to create sensation!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X