cozinsky said:
Today I was prosecuting someone for stealing a book from a library. The person was from a poor background, like so many South Africans are. The book he stole was a 1995 book and dealt with career opportunities. I thought to myself, if the person could only afford internet (adsl), there would have been no need for him to steal information. But because of Telkom's greed, he has no way of affording internet. We turned him into a thief. Shame on you Telkom!!!!
Excuse me if I become ignorant in any topics, I am only in matric - I'm certainly no lawyer and have no interest in ever going into that field. But I'd like to share my opinions on this topic...
Firstly, IMO it's more the government that's to blame for this one than Telkom - It isn't the
responsibility of a Company to provide services for free to the public. As far as I understand they should be sponsored through that company by the government?
Secondly, call the story sad, but prosecute the man... where's the consideration or sense in that?
Cruel world or not, I personally don't find it just to prosecute the man if you understand his circuimstances. You may not be religious, but ask yourself 'What would J e s u s (had to extend this one because vbulletin considers it swearing) do?' (forget cliche's please let's be serious). I'm sure
most religions would also support this basic ethic where you take your neighbour's life and circuimstances into consideration. It wasn't his fault he was born into poverty, and then he still gets this cruel situation against him. What if it were you, would you enjoy being prosecuted?
Sorry if I sound as though I'm attacking you, that's not really the intention, I'm just discussing my thoughts after I read your thread... perhaps I'm misunderstanding something.
Now what happens is that he develops a grudge against the white man in general because he isn't educated to the point of understanding that in fact you're just doing your job. As far as he's concerned, you know he has absolutely squat under his name, and yet you still deprived him of a BOOK, KNOWLEDGE which should be free for all (Is it not one of his rights to education? Could that not have been used in his defense?) So he hates us all in general and kills us. That's a bit of a generalisation/simplification but essentially that's what happens. Unfortunately.
Am I wrong? If so, PLEASE share your thoughts with me because then I must have one heck of a misconception that needs to be fixed ASAP ...