A UFO?

Mephisto_Helix said:
Thought it deserved it's own thread ....... was taking a stroll around the garden just snapping pics and when I inspected this one -

View1.JPG


I noticed the 'UFO' (above the house) .... So I cropped it and zoomed right in and for the life of me, I can't make out what normal thing this could be, so for now it's a UFO -

UFO1.jpg



:D
Click to expand...

Oh crap you did not see me wave :-(
next time I will move a little closer :p

hmm o.k I am serious now..
It is quite blurred, it could be and you caught it with chance of it being something of 35% , for it being a space craft, about 33% since the 2% dismisses it as a weather baloon. It does look like a swamp gas weather baloon thingy, it isnt disk shaped unless its on its side, revealing the underneath or topside of the craft if it were a sourcer. But if it were ball/egg shaped craft it would be uncertain.
then there is the 65% posibility it could be something on the lens of the camera, unless you have taken a second shot it would change the analytical assumptions and possibilities. It isnt nothing but it is something,
My personal thaughts state it to be 35% chance of it being a space craft not of this Earth, and a 65% possibility that it can be any random earthy object or mark on the lense.
its a pity you dont have a second shot, or it was closer, since the statistical judgment would change accordingly.
Lotsa Love
♥
It does look a bit like flying/floating a jellyfish
 
Last edited:
Mephisto_Helix said:
Thought it deserved it's own thread ....... was taking a stroll around the garden just snapping pics and when I inspected this one -

View1.JPG


I noticed the 'UFO' (above the house) .... So I cropped it and zoomed right in and for the life of me, I can't make out what normal thing this could be, so for now it's a UFO -

UFO1.jpg



:D
Click to expand...

Its a dirty focal lens.
 
ToxicBunny said:
Ke?

WTF!.....

How do you get to your percentages Zana?
Click to expand...

Its a skill I have learned, and it follows the processes of quantum/spectrum thinking; for there no real right or wrong, but scale probabilities and improbabilities, since it is something but not realy nothing. So one looks at it studies it and put it on a scale, but if there was another photo taken after or before this shot, if it moved or remained still or did not exist, the figures and assumptions of the object would change.
But if one would have a software that can actualy make the zoomed object clearer it would help, the problem is the image is in a bitmap of pixels, the more you zoom in the more pixels you get and when you smooth out the pixels it becomes blurred naturally, and when sharpening it, the dimensions are about 64.5% inacurate to that of the actual object.
Lotsa Love and huggles
((^_^))
 
Last edited:
Oh, ok.....

So you thumbsuck BS figures then spew forth more BS to try and cover up the fact that you have fsckall clue anyway....

Good to have that confirmed.
 
Mephisto_Helix said:
Don your tinfoil hats once more ..... it happened again. Once again, it's literally a flying object that to me is unidentified ;)

Main pic -

UFO_2_main_.JPG


Zoomed in -

UFO_2_closeup_.jpg



Anyone with very good graphics tools that could sharpen the image would help .........
Click to expand...

Was it moving when you took the shot ?
What speed was it moving?
If it was moving very rapidly from one end to the other its most likely to be a space craft of unknown origin or a meteor. If its direction of movement was irregulular and not linear , most likely a space craft. If it was linear most likely a meteor, if its spead was moving slowly , then its an earth based air craft like what the others presume at a high altitude.
If it wasnt there but then appeared on camera, since it was shot close to the sun it would most likely be a lense flair.
Lotsa Love and huggles
 
and it was more than likely a plane flying through the jetstream....

Nothing to see here people.. move along..
 
ToxicBunny said:
and it was more than likely a plane flying through the jetstream....

Nothing to see here people.. move along..
Click to expand...

I'd like a second opinion on the probability analysis before we move along, thank you very much...
 
Fine - I'll pay then. Right, please submit your probability analysis quotes...
 
I'll give you an accurate probablity curve based on predictive assumptions derived from the analysis of prior events in a matched geographical location...

Only cost you R75k
 
Sorry, I was hoping for something a little more specific and technical...
 
That can be provided..

Please state your specific requirements and we can tailor the report to suit your needs...
 
It's pretty easy actually. I will require transparent quantum probability expectation calculations; a comparison chart between bmp jpg and png, on a pixel basis; baseline calculations; quantitative cost estimates in relation to the quantum probability calculations - detailed and broken down per project phase, environmental impact studies on the work you will undertake and colour sequencing breakdowns.

I won't pay more than R10-00 for this though, I will require it delivered in soft and hard copy and presented to a management team by 13:00 on 27 June 2009...
 
I'd say the first pic was a hot air ballon. The second one was a plane flying at around 22000 ft or more. The trail that a plane leaves does not have to be very long. If you have a weather report and the actual alltitude of the plane you will see that condinsation (sorry if its spelled wrong) can be gone very very fast trough wind. So if the plane was at, lets say 32-40k ft you can see winds of up to 200 KM/h without a problem that just blows everything away. And if you are able to hear a plane in 10 KM hight (~32k ft) you have very good ears. Since the air is less dense up there sound will not travel so far as on the ground/sea hight.
 
ToxicBunny said:
Oh, ok.....

So you thumbsuck BS figures then spew forth more BS to try and cover up the fact that you have fsckall clue anyway....

Good to have that confirmed.
Click to expand...

No I dont.. but you may assume that hehe
Thank you, its a pleasure
:-)
((^_^))
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X